The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 01:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 261
Delay Technical

Had an interesting question with a couple of different opinions at the association meeting tonight. Here's the sit:

A1 has the ball OOB for a throw-in. B1, reaches across the line, and fouls A1. Team B has already received their team delay warning.

So the question is, what do you have here? Team B has already received their warning, so technically, as soon as B reaches over the line, it should be a technical foul. I argue that at this point, the ball is dead, and the contact, unless flagrant, should be ignored. Others seemed to disagree. Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 02:14am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
I believe this to be an intentional personal foul. I hope the fact that it's 3:14am isn't messing with my mind.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 02:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,007
Check the case book. The NFHS disagrees with you too.

THROW-IN FOULS
*10.3.11 SITUATION A: After a field goal, A1 has the ball out of bounds for a throw-in. Thrower A1 holds the ball: (a) B2 crosses the boundary line and fouls A1; or (b) B2 reaches through the out-of-bounds plane and touches the ball while in the hands of A1. RULING: It is an intentional personal foul in (a), and a technical foul in (b). In (a), such a contact foul with the thrower during a throw-in shall be considered intentional, or if it is violent, it should be ruled flagrant. COMMENT: Either act is a foul and it should be called whenever it occurs during a game without regard to time or score or whether the team had or had not been warned for a delay-of-game situation. If the player making the throw-in (A1) reaches through the out-of-bounds plane into the court and B1 then slaps the ball from the hand of A1, no violation has occurred. B1 has merely slapped a live ball from the

hands of A1. (4-19-3, 4; 9-2-11 Penalty 3, 4)

*10.3.11 SITUATION C: Team A scores near the end of the fourth quarter and is trailing by one point. B1 has the ball and is moving along the end line to make the throw-in. A2 steps out of bounds and fouls B1. Is the foul personal or technical? RULING: This is an intentional personal foul. The time remaining to be played or whether Team A had been previously warned for a delay-of-game situation is not a factor. If the team had not been warned, the foul constitutes the warning. (4-19-1; 9-2-11 Penalty 4)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 02:26am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,528
You have an intentional foul with or without a delay. Rule 9-2-10 Penalty #4.

If the player just touches or dislodges the ball, then it is a technical foul. Rule 10-3-11.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 07:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewNCref
Had an interesting question with a couple of different opinions at the association meeting tonight. Here's the sit:

A1 has the ball OOB for a throw-in. B1, reaches across the line, and fouls A1. Team B has already received their team delay warning.

So the question is, what do you have here? Team B has already received their warning, so technically, as soon as B reaches over the line, it should be a technical foul. I argue that at this point, the ball is dead, and the contact, unless flagrant, should be ignored. Others seemed to disagree. Any thoughts?
You're overthinking it. If the "act" of reaching over the line also includes contact with the ball or the inbounder, call the more severe penalty. Only if the the act of reaching over does not include contat do you enforce the "breaking the plane" provisions. Do not pick nits about the timing and that the ball became dead instantaneously when the plane was broken.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 08:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
You're overthinking it. If the "act" of reaching over the line also includes contact with the ball or the inbounder, call the more severe penalty. Only if the the act of reaching over does not include contat do you enforce the "breaking the plane" provisions. Do not pick nits about the timing and that the ball became dead instantaneously when the plane was broken.
Best advice to be given for a long, long time. I'm wondering if we could generalize this, make it into a philosophy, and teach it as an interpretive law. But then what would the mods have to moderate all day, except the spam and VI?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 08:42am
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,669
New in this year's case book:

*10.3.11 SITUATION D: A1 is out of bonds for a throw-in. B1 reaches through the boundary plane and knocks the ball out of A1's hands. Earlier in the game, Team B had received a team warning for delay. RULING: Even though Team B had already been issued a warning for team delay, when B1 breaks the plane and subsequently contacts the ball in the thrower's hand, it is considered all the same act and the end result is penalized. A player technical foul is assessed to B1; two free throws and a division line throw-in for Team A will follow. The previous warning for team delay still applies with any subsequent team delay resulting in a team technical foul. (4-47; 9-2-10 Penalty 3; 10-1-10)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 08:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by rainmaker
Best advice to be given for a long, long time. I'm wondering if we could generalize this, make it into a philosophy, and teach it as an interpretive law. But then what would the mods have to moderate all day, except the spam and VI?
But it would have to be a specific rule, not an interpretation, right? Remember, anything added to the case book is just someone's opinion, not the actual rule.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 09:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 261
Thanks all! Here in NC, the state association hasn't sent out rulebooks/casebooks yet, so I don't have the new one. Nevertheless, I stand corrected!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 12:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
But it would have to be a specific rule, not an interpretation, right? Remember, anything added to the case book is just someone's opinion, not the actual rule.
You misunderstand. If it's in the case book, it's just as binding as if it were in the rules. However, it's only authoritative if you happen to be the committee member who wrote it. For everybody else, it's just another opinion.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 03:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
I believe this to be an intentional personal foul. I hope the fact that it's 3:14am isn't messing with my mind.
What are u doing up at 3:14am on this forum?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 18, 2007, 06:20pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwanr1
What are u doing up at 3:14am on this forum?
Caught a cold, woke up in the middle of the night due to coughing. Nothing to do except surf the net. Sure as hell ain't watchin' the soft stuff on TV at that hour.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Violation, Delay of Game, Technical, what is the call? djskinn Basketball 9 Fri Dec 22, 2006 10:33pm
Delay on B? dumbref Football 17 Sat Oct 29, 2005 01:13pm
Delay of Game Redneck Ref Basketball 7 Wed Mar 24, 2004 02:02am
Delay T Dan_ref Basketball 7 Sun Feb 01, 2004 07:53am
Delay after TO physicsref Basketball 26 Thu Dec 06, 2001 09:21pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1