The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 13, 2007, 04:12pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,768
Legal Guarding Position

Don't know if there has already been a thread on this or not (and too lazy to search), but I was just reading thru the NCAA Rules Changes, and see that NCAA-W has revoked the ruling that a defender under the basket did not have legal guarding position - in order to make LGP the same for any player anywhere on the court...hmmm - wonder why they had the big change of mind on that one?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 13, 2007, 04:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad
Don't know if there has already been a thread on this or not (and too lazy to search), but I was just reading thru the NCAA Rules Changes, and see that NCAA-W has revoked the ruling that a defender under the basket did not have legal guarding position - in order to make LGP the same for any player anywhere on the court...hmmm - wonder why they had the big change of mind on that one?
I think it was because it was being called inconsistantly. How far is "under the basket" without lines? When did a north-south drive become an east-west drive, in which case the defender could have LGP under the basket? It was a good idea, and I understood the theory, but in practice it was hard to administer. Now we don't have to add in the additional conditions about exactly where the defender is standing and where the drive originated.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 13, 2007, 04:38pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
I think it was because it was being called inconsistantly.
Naw, it was because it was dumb and illogical right from the git-go. Only a stoopid monkey or the NBA would try to impose different rules on how to call the exact same play dependent on where that play occurred on the court.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 13, 2007, 04:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Naw, it was because it was dumb and illogical right from the git-go. Only a stoopid monkey or the NBA would try to impose different rules on how to call the exact same play dependent on where that play occurred on the court.
Well, there's that, too.

Actually, the theory was that a player guarding a drive down the lane for a layup, who was directly under the basket, was only at that spot to draw a charge; they would not be in a position to block the shot or play any other type of defense. However, on a drive along the baseline, the offensive player could shoot or pass, and therefore the defender standing in the exact same spot has more defensive options for being in that spot.

Now, I already hear you typing your responses, and I'll tell you right up front I agree with your points already. But, as you've also stated, (many times), it's our job to call the rules as written, and not to call the game how we think it should be called. Right?

(Btw, I know it was being called inconsistantly because I was calling it inconsistantly...)
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 13, 2007, 05:02pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy

But, as you've also stated, (many times), it's our job to call the rules as written, and not to call the game how we think it should be called. Right?
Well, there's that too.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 13, 2007, 06:23pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad
NCAA-W has revoked the ruling that a defender under the basket did not have legal guarding position - in order to make LGP the same for any player anywhere on the court...
I think that it will also be emphasized to the men this year that block/charge will be called per rule, without regard to position on the court.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 13, 2007, 06:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad
Don't know if there has already been a thread on this or not (and too lazy to search), but I was just reading thru the NCAA Rules Changes, and see that NCAA-W has revoked the ruling that a defender under the basket did not have legal guarding position - in order to make LGP the same for any player anywhere on the court...hmmm - wonder why they had the big change of mind on that one?
There definitely was a previous thread on this change. I'm sure because that is how I learned of it. For some strange reason I can't locate that thread with the search function. Perhaps someone else can find it and post a link.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 14, 2007, 06:33am
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
There definitely was a previous thread on this change. I'm sure because that is how I learned of it. For some strange reason I can't locate that thread with the search function. Perhaps someone else can find it and post a link.
I mentioned it in the NBA block charge thread, up until then I had not heard it mention.

As I mention before, I am disappointed and I think it is a step in the wrong direction. But with the turmoil in the NBA officiating community, I can see the women's committee pasting on this part. Not to mention that their game is not as physical as the men, especially at the Pro level where it was necessary to implement a restrictive area.

I can also see how this could be called inconsistently too. I was hoping the men's would incorporate this into their language and begin to move away from this unwritten rule.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 14, 2007, 06:58am
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Actually, the theory was that a player guarding a drive down the lane for a layup, who was directly under the basket, was only at that spot to draw a charge; they would not be in a position to block the shot or play any other type of defense. However, on a drive along the baseline, the offensive player could shoot or pass, and therefore the defender standing in the exact same spot has more defensive options for being in that spot.
Thank you for providing this explanation. I oftened wondered why it was acceptable to stand under the basket if the drive was from the baseline. Good stuff....!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 14, 2007, 10:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
I mentioned it in the NBA block charge thread, up until then I had not heard it mention.
No, this was a few months ago, and Jurassic had some comments on the change.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal Guarding Position Jurassic Referee Basketball 49 Fri May 04, 2007 01:12pm
Legal Guarding Position flsh224 Basketball 69 Sat Oct 25, 2003 08:52am
OOB/Legal Guarding Position SOWB_Ref Basketball 4 Wed Mar 05, 2003 10:31am
Legal guarding position co2ice Basketball 30 Tue Jan 22, 2002 12:08am
Legal guarding position MOFFICIAL Basketball 4 Mon Jan 21, 2002 08:45pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1