Backcourt violation?

[Hawks Coach]

Thank you Mark DEXTER. I thought we were being preety light handed and only one person chose to come in heavy handed late in the game.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally posted by Hawks Coach
Thank you Mark DEXTER. I thought we were being preety light handed and only one person chose to come in heavy handed late in the game.

Gee. No thanks to me? I'm going to take my ball and go home. So there!

[Hawks Coach]

Thanks MP too - I was just referring to his last post

I appreciate that you, too, saw fit to try to restate the question as something that could be answered, and then answer it, rather than cop an attitude.

[112448]

so Mr. DeNucci are you going to provide answers to your situations?

Jake

[Hawks Coach]

Originally posted by 112448
so Mr. DeNucci are you going to provide answers to your situations?

Jake

I will offer my answers since Mr. DeNucci is still worrying about the lack of clarity in the intial situation. In each scenario, we are looking for 1) team control, 2) ball with frontcourt status, 3) A last to touch FC, and 4) A first to touch after ball goes BC.

1 No violation. Even if ball achieved FC status prior to touching B1(not clearly stated in Mr. DeNucci's scenario and I don't want to assume!), B is first to touch in BC.
2 Violation - A team control, ball had FC status, A last to touch FC and first to touch after ball had gone BC
3a No violation - B last to touch in FC
3b No violation - same as above (not clear as to the significance of differentiating between ball hitting court BC and A2 touching ball while BC)
4 Violation, same as 2 above

Those are my answers. Since there were some curious differences between a couple of the examples, I would like to know if Mark DeNucci accepts these answers.