Mr. DeNucci Sr. sir - if A2 had been in the backcourt, there would not have been the post at all since there is no issue. I agree it is risky to assume, but in this case, the post only becomes a case if A2 was in the frontcourt when the ball hit him.
Assuming (there's that word again)A2 was in the frontcourt, it is irrelevant as to the status of B1, so one can make a ruling that is valid.
That ruling is: violation.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
|