We don't need no stinkin' new rules - or do we?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by chartrusepengui

Ok, - I understand - but isn't that just a personal foul? I have been to our required state meetings where it has been emphasized that personal fouls can sometimes be violent in nature as far as contact is concerned, but NOT flagrant or intentional. My point is that instead of changing terminology - just to call it appropriately. I don't think that changing terminology is going to change the way excess contact is called. JMO :-)

sometimes, but a foul can also be intentional based solely on the severity.