Fri May 18, 2007, 12:25pm
|
certified Hot Mom tester
|
|
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartrusepengui
I think this is nuts. There are situations where "intentional fouls" are not flagrant and should not be labeled as such.
I don't necessarily think that NBA rules, and the way officials interpret and call them is something I want high school athletics and/or officials at this level to aspire to.
IMO, I honestly believe the "terminology" change would create more problems than it would help, although I agree that many incorrectly call the intentional foul. PC's can and should be called for excessive contact when there may not have been intent. We should all strive to make the correct call instead of making terminology changes to cover poor judgement, rules knowledge, and mechanics.
|
What I was trying to address were the situations in which we call an "intentional" when it really is a flagrant when it doesn't necessarily rise to the level of including ejection.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
|