View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 18, 2007, 12:31pm
chartrusepengui chartrusepengui is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
Ok, - I understand - but isn't that just a personal foul? I have been to our required state meetings where it has been emphasized that personal fouls can sometimes be violent in nature as far as contact is concerned, but NOT flagrant or intentional. My point is that instead of changing terminology - just to call it appropriately. I don't think that changing terminology is going to change the way excess contact is called. JMO :-)
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote