The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 07, 2007, 04:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Never throw away your old rule books. See POE #3B-from last years rulebook.

Nevada can cut'n'paste it for everybody sometime.
Can you give the gist of the rule for me since I don't have a rulebook?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 07, 2007, 04:51pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian
Team B takes the ball in, rushes to half court where team A is going to foul. Just as I at C am about to call the first contact for a foul, Team B's coach is asking for a timeout. So, may partner granted it as he was asking before the fould occurred. Bad move.
If the timeout request happened first, then that's what should be called first. It's not a "bad" move. It's the "proper" move. Your job is to call the game as it happens, not manipulate it to make it move in a certain way. If you do this, then the players truly determine the outcome of the game and that is how it should be.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 07, 2007, 06:37pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,955
Pregame

From my "Long Version (Working With A Rookie)" Pregame:

Last Two Minutes
Near the end of the game, be aware of coaches calling time-outs and be sure to inform them after they have used all their time outs.
We’re not calling anything in the last two minutes if we haven’t already called it earlier in the game, unless it’s so blatant that it can’t be ignored. We don’t want our first illegal screen to be called with 30 seconds left in the game; but if the illegal screen puts a player into the first row of the bleachers, then we have to call it.
Let’s not put the whistles away in the last two minutes: That wouldn’t be consistent with the way we’ve been calling the game. If the game dictates it, let the players win or lose the game at the line. We don’t want to be the ones who decide the game by ignoring obvious fouls just to get the game over.
End of game strategic fouls: If the winning team is just holding the ball and is willing to take the free throws, then let’s call the foul immediately, so the ballhandler doesn’t get hit harder to draw a whistle. Let’s make sure there is a play on the ball by the defense. If there’s no play on the ball, if the defense grabs the jersey from behind, or if the ballhandler receives a bear hug, we should consider an intentional foul. These are not basketball plays and should be penalized as intentional.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 07, 2007, 06:46pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by fiasco
Can you give the gist of the rule for me since I don't have a rulebook?
For you?

No.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 07, 2007, 06:51pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
We’re not calling anything in the last two minutes if we haven’t already called it earlier in the game, unless it’s so blatant that it can’t be ignored. We don’t want our first illegal screen to be called with 30 seconds left in the game; but if the illegal screen puts a player into the first row of the bleachers, then we have to call it.
Am I the only one who sees a dichotomy here? In fact, I see two.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 07, 2007, 06:52pm
Aleve Titles to Others
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Westchester of the Southern Conference
Posts: 5,381
Send a message via AIM to 26 Year Gap
They sell them on EBay. Just got the 1960-61 book a few days ago. Once I get to the changes I will pass them along for you fiasco.
__________________
Never hit a piñata if you see hornets flying out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 07, 2007, 07:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kaukauna, WI
Posts: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett
Am I the only one who sees a dichotomy here? In fact, I see two.
Wouldn't that be a bidichotomy?
__________________
Quitters never win, winners never quit, but those who never win AND never quit are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 07, 2007, 08:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Never throw away your old rule books. See POE #3B-from last years rulebook.

Nevada can cut'n'paste it for everybody sometime.
B. Late in the game. Fouling is an accepted coaching strategy and is utilized by nearly all coaches in some form. It is viewed as a chance for a team behind in the score to get back in the game while the clock is stopped. There is widespread belief that it works or it wouldn't be coached.
There is a right way and a wrong way to foul. Coaches must instruct their players in the proper technique for strategic fouling. "Going for the ball" is a common phrase heard, but intentional fouls should still be called on players who go for the ball if it is not done properly. Conversely, a coach who yells, "Foul!" instructions to his or her team does not mean the ensuing foul is "automatically" an intentional foul – even though it is a strategic foul designed to stop the clock. Coaches, officials, players, fans and administrators must accept fouling as a legitimate coaching strategy.
With that, officials must have the courage to enforce the intentional foul rule. Far too often, officials do not whistle fouls as intentional when the act clearly meets the criteria. Officiating philosophies should not change because of the time remaining in the game or the score differential. The correct call should be made – not the popular one.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 08, 2007, 08:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by fiasco
Can you give the gist of the rule for me since I don't have a rulebook?
That's obvious from your posts. Maybe Old School could cut & paste it for you. No, wait, s/he doesn't own one either.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 08, 2007, 09:49am
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett
Am I the only one who sees a dichotomy here? In fact, I see two.
I don't see it. Are you saying there's a contradiction in saying that if we haven't called it in the first 30 minutes, or whatever, we're not calling something unless it's obvious to everybody?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 08, 2007, 10:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
I don't see it. Are you saying there's a contradiction in saying that if we haven't called it in the first 30 minutes, or whatever, we're not calling something unless it's obvious to everybody?
This doesn't change whether you called it earlier in the game or not. If it's "obvious to everyone" that it's a foul, then hopefully you called it earlier in the game, and you'd still be consistent by calling it late in the game.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 08, 2007, 11:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
B. Late in the game. Fouling is an accepted coaching strategy and is utilized by nearly all coaches in some form. It is viewed as a chance for a team behind in the score to get back in the game while the clock is stopped. There is widespread belief that it works or it wouldn't be coached.
There is a right way and a wrong way to foul. Coaches must instruct their players in the proper technique for strategic fouling. "Going for the ball" is a common phrase heard, but intentional fouls should still be called on players who go for the ball if it is not done properly. Conversely, a coach who yells, "Foul!" instructions to his or her team does not mean the ensuing foul is "automatically" an intentional foul – even though it is a strategic foul designed to stop the clock. Coaches, officials, players, fans and administrators must accept fouling as a legitimate coaching strategy.
With that, officials must have the courage to enforce the intentional foul rule. Far too often, officials do not whistle fouls as intentional when the act clearly meets the criteria. Officiating philosophies should not change because of the time remaining in the game or the score differential. The correct call should be made – not the popular one.
Thanks, Nevada.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 08, 2007, 01:03pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018
This doesn't change whether you called it earlier in the game or not. If it's "obvious to everyone" that it's a foul, then hopefully you called it earlier in the game, and you'd still be consistent by calling it late in the game.
But the converse is not true. We might call something that is NOT obvious to everyone earlier in the game, for a number of reasons. At the end of the game, though, if we haven't already called something throughout the whole game, then it better be obvious to everybody why we're calling it.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 08, 2007, 01:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018
This doesn't change whether you called it earlier in the game or not. If it's "obvious to everyone" that it's a foul, then hopefully you called it earlier in the game, and you'd still be consistent by calling it late in the game.
That's not really the point.

End of game fouls ARE obvious to everyone because the fouling player WANTS it to be obvious to everyone. So it gets called.

Rarely the case outside of the last minute or so of the game.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 08, 2007, 03:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018
This doesn't change whether you called it earlier in the game or not. If it's "obvious to everyone" that it's a foul, then hopefully you called it earlier in the game, and you'd still be consistent by calling it late in the game.
The point is that the situation may not have occured earlier in the game.

If something entirely new happens in the last 2 minutes, make sure it needs to be called before blowing the whistle.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Technical foul during time-out zebraman Basketball 12 Wed Dec 08, 2004 07:29am
Another long time listener, first time caller Fifth And Goal Basketball 11 Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:30am
foul shoots as time expires readingofficial Basketball 8 Thu Feb 19, 2004 09:13pm
When is it time to call Time / Dead ball? Deion Softball 1 Tue Jul 01, 2003 11:50am
Double Whistle:Time Out or Foul? blacktiger Basketball 6 Wed Jan 03, 2001 09:47am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1