Huntington HS in trouble!

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by deecee

fullor30 -- you should maybe prescribe yourself your own medication.

OJ admitted to bumping -- whether or not Lazzo overacted is not for anyone to decide -- OJ bumped him and whether he fell or not doesnt change that fact.

Quick T -- your opinion -- it counts for less than a sportcasters knowledge of the rules -- and in the tape you CAN hear what is going on and you know the WHOLE events of the game and what happened.

Deecee...........again, I'm only making an observation from the tape. I'm not making a judgement of intent be it malice or incidental. Of course he bumped him, of course he should be suspended. My point AGAIN, is that by the tape ONLY, the fall looks suspect. Anyone who thinks he flopped or planned this of course dead wrong.Lazo probably had no idea who was behind him and it could have been his partner who caused him to fall. All I'm commenting on is the physical aspect of the fall and glad it wasn't me.

My 10 year old saw it and thought the fall was embellished, nothing more,nothing less. He had no idea who the player was, nor the situation.

Strictly an observation

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by fullor30

My point AGAIN, is that by the tape ONLY, the fall looks suspect.

Anyone who thinks he flopped or planned this of course dead wrong.

You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. You're saying that he flopped but anybody who thinks that he flopped is wrong. Fullor, you're the one that thinks that he flopped, and you posted as such.

Your exact words were "but by the tape of the 'flop', it looks more bogus than a WWF main event.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. You're saying that he flopped but anybody who thinks that he flopped is wrong. Fullor, you're the one that thinks that he flopped, and you posted as such.

Your exact words were "but by the tape of the 'flop', it looks more bogus than a WWF main event.

Precisely, anyone looking at the tape WITHOUT knowing the particulars would be inclined IMHO that it looks theatrical. In addition using the word BUT in any instance dismisses the previous statement. Also, the fall is described on youtube as the fosbury flop hence italics around 'flop'.

Next you'll want me to diagram my sentences. Any dangling participles?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by fullor30

Precisely, anyone looking at the tape WITHOUT knowing the particulars would be inclined IMHO that it looks theatrical.

There's where we disagree. Fanboys would think that. Officials wouldn't.

[fullor30]

[QUOTE=Jurassic Referee]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkt4YdLdXjM&mode=related&search=
By the way, I believe you said you looked at the tape five times and saw no elbow by opposing player. Sixth time may be the charm in your case

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkt4Y...elated&search=


Therein I feel lies your problem, the us against 'fanboys' mentality.

Is the chip on your shoulder oak or cherry?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by fullor30

Therein I feel lies your problem, the us against 'fanboys' mentality.

Yup, I certainly gotta agree with that. And I don't consider you as being part of us either, fanboy.

You're entitled to your opinion. If you felt that the official flopped, and that was flop was as bogus as a WWF main event, hey, so be it. I respect your right to have that opinion. I don't respect your actual opinion though. And never will.

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Yup, I certainly gotta agree with that. And I don't consider you as being part of us either, fanboy.

You're entitled to your opinion. If you felt that the official flopped, and that was flop was as bogus as a WWF main event, hey, so be it. I respect your right to have that opinion. I don't respect your actual opinion though. And never will.

Gee, I'm never going to be part of your cabal? Are you always this simple minded? Again, for the comprehension impaired, it LOOKED like a 'flop' from the tape to the casual observer.

Please tell me you got out after they eliminated center jump after every basket.

[JRutledge]

[QUOTE=fullor30]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkt4YdLdXjM&mode=related&search=
By the way, I believe you said you looked at the tape five times and saw no elbow by opposing player. Sixth time may be the charm in your case

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkt4Y...elated&search=


Therein I feel lies your problem, the us against 'fanboys' mentality.

Is the chip on your shoulder oak or cherry?

There has to be a chip on a shoulder because someone thinks your point of view is silly. Next thing you are going to tell me if we disagree about politics, then there has to be a chip as well.

BTW, I do not think the official flopped. If Mr. Big Time did not want anyone to pick on him, then he should know when to walk away and he would have had nothing to worry about. Some problems in life you create yourself.

Peace

[26 Year Gap]

White 12 did flick out his elbow. But that had nothing to do with his beelining to the reporting official. The acts are mutually exclusive.

Dang! Nick Van Exel. That was that thug's name that I thought I had forgotten. Dang! Dang! Dang!

[fullor30]

[QUOTE=JRutledge]

Originally Posted by fullor30

There has to be a chip on a shoulder because someone thinks your point of view is silly. Next thing you are going to tell me if we disagree about politics, then there has to be a chip as well.

BTW, I do not think the official flopped. If Mr. Big Time did not want anyone to pick on him, then he should know when to walk away and he would have had nothing to worry about. Some problems in life you create yourself.

Peace

If you read my other posts all I said was it LOOKED like a flop to the casual observer. Most of the posts here have agreed his fall looked strange. Nothing more nothing less. Of course he was tripped, that doesn't change the fact it still looks strange and as always, IMHO. You may think otherwise.