![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
BTW, I called OOB b/c like I said, the first time I saw the ball was when A1 was standing with her foot on the baseline. I definitely didn't see if their was a hold when B1 initially reached in and I do not know if the ball did or didn't come loose while I was straight-lined. I called the only thing that I actually saw, which was A1 and B1 in simultaneous possession of the ball and A1's foot on the baseline. A1 must have thought I had it out for her by the end of the game b/c later on I did get her for a picture perfect player control foul in which the defender established LGP and then slid perfectly into position to absorb the charge. Then later A1 tied up a player who had just gotten a defensive rebound but A1 did so with her toe on the baseline. Team A's fans sure were letting me have it by then. (especially since somewhere along this timeline I had to T up Team A's coach).
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 10:39pm. |
|
|||
|
maybe move your body or your lean your head & shoulders slightly to quickly to get a look between players? I'm not saying I could have done any better, but I agree with DAnRef in that you know it had to be either a held ball or a foul, because B1 reached in and both players spun around.
__________________
P.S. is what that part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R were eliminated from it. |
|
|||
|
Even if you don't "see" everything, you can often deduce a lot from what you can see.
To call OOB, A loses the ball no matter what....perhaps unfairly. In calling the held ball, A may lose the ball or may not but they will at least end up with the arrow if they do lose the ball. I'm not suggesting you just call the held ball every time you can't see something, just stating what the ramifications are. In this case, I think you've probably got a foul or a held ball based on the fact that A1's body was spun around in a way that, as described, could only be caused by B1 grabbing something. I don't think you can come up with a foul based on what was described. A1's hands were both on the ball when A1 came down. If B1's hands were on the ball when A1 came down, you've definitely got justification for a held ball. Even if B1's hands were not on the ball, the actions you did observe still suggest a held ball. Furthermore, You can sometimes deduce a foul by B even if you can't see the contact by the physical response of A (not always, but sometimes). If B had been holding onto A's arm, you can tell by how the ball pops out and how A's arms move. For example, A1 bringing the ball up with both hands, B get's their arm in there but you can't see cleanly. A1's arms both continue up without the ball...could be clean, could be a foul. You don't have enough info to call anything. But, if A1 has one arm continue up but one arm stays down and the ball pops out awkwardly, I'm calling a foul....that only happens if B1 is hanging on the arm of A1. I don't have to see B1 hanging on A1's arm to know that it happened. It doesn't sound like this is your case. It sounds like A1 continued to hold onto the ball with both arms. Not enough info to justify a foul.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm with the "gotta see it" bunch. If the films show that I missed something, I'll hang my head in abject shame....and then forget about it. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| held ball? | just another ref | Basketball | 10 | Sun Jan 15, 2006 03:56pm |
| Held ball | faitheagle | Basketball | 4 | Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:54am |
| held ball | coachgrd | Basketball | 49 | Sat Jan 22, 2005 02:46pm |
| held ball | roadking | Basketball | 5 | Wed Mar 31, 2004 05:28am |
| Held Ball | whistleblower | Basketball | 5 | Mon Nov 25, 2002 06:24pm |