Punching the ball

[BoomerSooner]

I've had it explained that a closed fist punch allows the ball to be dislodged from an opponent's grasp easier than other methods and that along with the associated danger of throwing punches (even if directed at the ball) are the primary reasons the action became a violation. I could be wrong in saying that was the original reason for the rule, but it makes sense for me.

[BktBallRef]

I called it once, during my first year of varsity basketball. I've never called....ur, I mean, seen it again.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

I called it once, during my first year of varsity basketball. I've never called....ur, I mean, seen it again.

I've called it a few times when the swing ended up just too close to an opponent. It's the same concept as the (now) "elbow" violation.

I've also called it in football on defenders trying to punch the ball out, but getting the ball carrier instead. As you know, they use the same excuse too--"I was just going for the ball".

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by BoomerSooner

I've had it explained that a closed fist punch allows the ball to be dislodged from an opponent's grasp easier than other methods and that along with the associated danger of throwing punches (even if directed at the ball) are the primary reasons the action became a violation. I could be wrong in saying that was the original reason for the rule, but it makes sense for me.

That very reason was listed in a POE many, many moons ago as the reason the rule was implemented.