The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 10:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Wisconsin
Posts: 302
Double Checking 3 Answers?

A sign of "old age".....they keep changing the rules on us!

I know these answers may be obvious to most of you....but, just wanted to double check with all the experts to see if I'm still with it.

NFHS BB - Part II

25. "Continuous motion only applies if the defensive foul is committed against the shooter."
TRUE - (Can an off-ball foul against another team member of the shooter have any significance with "continuous motion" on the shooter? ie: counting the basket on a foul away from the shooter?)

40. "If both parts of a double personal foul are intentional, each fouled player is awarded two free throws."
FALSE - No free throws....throw-in POI.

76. "A team member may wear jewelry provided he/she does not become a player."
FALSE - My partner & I disagree over this statement. He feels he can't penalize if the person with jewelry doesn't become a player. I maintain that the person wearing jewelry is a "team member" and as such...3.5.1 refers to "team members" shall not wear equipment/apparel that is not appropriate, and 3.5.7 refers to jewelry not permitted....I'm assuming....among "team members". A'm I reading too much into this? Or, heaven forbid, my partner is correct when he says the statement is True because the "team member" hasn't violated anything until they become a player.

Thanks in advance of your responses!
__________________
"All our calls are good calls...."
"...Some of them are better than others!"
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 11:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaref
76. "A team member may wear jewelry provided he/she does not become a player."
FALSE - My partner & I disagree over this statement. He feels he can't penalize if the person with jewelry doesn't become a player. I maintain that the person wearing jewelry is a "team member" and as such...3.5.1 refers to "team members" shall not wear equipment/apparel that is not appropriate, and 3.5.7 refers to jewelry not permitted....I'm assuming....among "team members". A'm I reading too much into this? Or, heaven forbid, my partner is correct when he says the statement is True because the "team member" hasn't violated anything until they become a player.

Thanks in advance of your responses!
You can't penalize anyway, There is no penalty. Sure, players can wear jewelry on the bench. They can't wear it during warm-ups, though, if they're out on the floor, and they certainly can't come into the game with it. But there's no penalty, remember that.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 11:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaref
A sign of "old age".....they keep changing the rules on us!

I know these answers may be obvious to most of you....but, just wanted to double check with all the experts to see if I'm still with it.

NFHS BB - Part II

25. "Continuous motion only applies if the defensive foul is committed against the shooter."
TRUE - (Can an off-ball foul against another team member of the shooter have any significance with "continuous motion" on the shooter? ie: counting the basket on a foul away from the shooter?)
FALSE -- it applies on any foul by the defense.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 11:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
FALSE -- it applies on any foul by the defense.
So if A1 has started to go up for a jump shot, and B1 fouls A2 under the basket before A1 shot is released, if it goes in you count it and give A2 free throws if they are in the bonus or if not the ball out of bounds? I just thought the ball had to be released first before you could count it.
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 12:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by jritchie
So if A1 has started to go up for a jump shot, and B1 fouls A2 under the basket before A1 shot is released, if it goes in you count it and give A2 free throws if they are in the bonus or if not the ball out of bounds? I just thought the ball had to be released first before you could count it.
Your thought is correct.
__________________
truerookie
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 12:38pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by truerookie
Quote:
Originally Posted by jritchie
So if A1 has started to go up for a jump shot, and B1 fouls A2 under the basket before A1 shot is released, if it goes in you count it and give A2 free throws if they are in the bonus or if not the ball out of bounds? I just thought the ball had to be released first before you could count it.
Your thought is correct.
Whoa, there! Jritchie's thought was NOT correct. If A2 is fouled while A1 is in the act of shooting, the basket will count even if the ball is still in A1's hand at the time of the foul. It does NOT have to be released.

Continuous motion applies to any defensive foul (as long as it's not part of a double foul), just as Bob J said.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 12:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by jritchie
So if A1 has started to go up for a jump shot, and B1 fouls A2 under the basket before A1 shot is released, if it goes in you count it and give A2 free throws if they are in the bonus or if not the ball out of bounds?
Yes.

Quote:
I just thought the ball had to be released first before you could count it.
No. See 6-"the ball becomes dead when" and read one of the notes / exceptions (sorry, I don't have the books handy, so I can't be more specific)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 12:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Wisconsin
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by rainmaker
You can't penalize anyway, There is no penalty. Sure, players can wear jewelry on the bench. They can't wear it during warm-ups, though, if they're out on the floor, and they certainly can't come into the game with it. But there's no penalty, remember that.
So....is the statement " A team member may wear jewelry provided he/she does not become a player." .... True or False?
__________________
"All our calls are good calls...."
"...Some of them are better than others!"
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 01:34pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaref
So....is the statement " A team member may wear jewelry provided he/she does not become a player." .... True or False?
False.

From a POE in the 2002-03 rule book --"No team member may wear jewelry during the pre-game warm-up period or during the contest". Team members are defined as bench personnel who are in uniform and eligible to be becoime a "player", under rule 4-34-4.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 01:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Yes.



No. See 6-"the ball becomes dead when" and read one of the notes / exceptions (sorry, I don't have the books handy, so I can't be more specific)
6.7.7 Exception c.

If you can log into NFHS.org, the rules and case books are available online.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 02:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
Thanks, learn something everyday! That is why this board is great.
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 03:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Wisconsin
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaref
40. "If both parts of a double personal foul are intentional, each fouled player is awarded two free throws."
FALSE - No free throws....throw-in POI.
Everyone agree that 40 is False?
__________________
"All our calls are good calls...."
"...Some of them are better than others!"
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 15, 2006, 05:19pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaref
Everyone agree that 40 is False?
I'm not everyone, but I agree that it is false, by virtue of Rule 10 Summary 1-c.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just checking... The Roamin' Umpire Football 13 Tue Oct 03, 2006 07:18am
Just checking.. kcs_hiker Softball 10 Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:43am
Just Checking MisterV Softball 10 Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:20pm
SW FL checking in SWFLguy Football 4 Mon Aug 23, 2004 04:10pm
just checking golfdesigner Basketball 45 Fri Feb 01, 2002 03:07pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1