Detroit-Miami Game 2

[zebraman]

Originally Posted by mick

"From Dick's point of view, he was so caught up in watching for the inbounds pass that he wasn't paying any attention to me," said Prince, who said Bavetta apologized to him afterward. "That upset me. He has to be looking in my area."

I hate it when I make mental mistakes.
Forget "classy" and do not make that error.
mick

I don't see any error on Bavetta's part. If the administering official is zoned in on the inbounder, he isn't helping his two partners out much. Looking through the inbounder to see other matchups is good officiating. With a loud crowd, the inbounder needs to make the time-out obvious.

Z

[mick]

Originally Posted by zebraman

I don't see any error on Bavetta's part. If the administering official is zoned in on the inbounder, he isn't helping his two partners out much. Looking through the inbounder to see other matchups is good officiating. With a loud crowd, the inbounder needs to make the time-out obvious.

Z

Z,
I see nothing wrong with what you say.
But if Bavetta didn't screw up, he had no need to apologize for not covering his primary.
mick

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by mick

Z,
I see nothing wrong with what you say.
But if Bavetta didn't screw up, he had no need to apologize for not covering his primary.
mick

He didn't apologize for missing the TO. Prince said that he said something ugly to him and that's what he apologized for.

[Dribble]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

He didn't apologize for missing the TO. Prince said that he said something ugly to him and that's what he apologized for.

We must be talking about a different interview because in the one that I saw, Prince said that Bavetta apologized for missing the TO call. Did Prince do another interview in the press room after the game?

I still think the apology was said not because he was wrong, but it was the professional thing to do. Why linger around after the game? Quickly say you're sorry and leave.

I'm still on Bavetta's side here with regards to not recognizing the TO. The onus is on the player and his teammates to alert the official of the timeout request.

While officials need to be aware of the situation, the official also needs to be in a position to ref the inbounds play. That's why if you saw the replay you would've seen Bavetta about 6ft. away from Prince. If you're right beside the inbounder, then you have a more difficult time seeing any violations. Due to the distance of the official in this case, Prince needed to make a visual request, too, because the arena was so loud.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by Dribble

We must be talking about a different interview because in the one that I saw, Prince said that Bavetta apologized for missing the TO call. Did Prince do another interview in the press room after the game?

I didn;t know we were talking. I was addressing left coast's post.

Jim Gray interviewed Prince immediately after the game before he left the floor.

Bavetta was looking at the contact between two players when Prince whispered for TO.

[Dribble]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

I didn;t know we were talking.

You're on an online forum, on a thread that I started and you get snarky about me asking if we're talking about two different interviews? Classy...

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by Dribble

You're on an online forum, on a thread that I started and you get snarky about me asking if we're talking about two different interviews? Classy...

I wasn't being snarky, whatever the hell that means. I quoted left coast, when I posted. That's why I said I didn't know we were talking. Don't be such an butt.

[Jimgolf]

Originally Posted by zebraman

I don't see any error on Bavetta's part. If the administering official is zoned in on the inbounder, he isn't helping his two partners out much.

Someone has to be watching the inbounder and the defender guarding the pass. With 3 officials, there is no reason for the administering official not to be watching this. How can he see if the inbounder has stepped over the line if he's not watching the inbounder, among other things? Especially when the count is nearing 5, he should anticipate the time out and look for it, as it is a common play - 1-2-3-4-timeout.

He's got to trust his partners. The two non-administering officials ought to be able to handle all the other action. After all, for most of the NBA's history, there were only two officials.

[zebraman]

Originally Posted by Jimgolf

Someone has to be watching the inbounder and the defender guarding the pass. With 3 officials, there is no reason for the administering official not to be watching this. How can he see if the inbounder has stepped over the line if he's not watching the inbounder, among other things? Especially when the count is nearing 5, he should anticipate the time out and look for it, as it is a common play - 1-2-3-4-timeout.

He's got to trust his partners. The two non-administering officials ought to be able to handle all the other action. After all, for most of the NBA's history, there were only two officials.

I haven't heard Dick Bavetta say that he screwed up yet. He may have said something to the inbounder like, "if you requested one, I'm sorry because I didn't hear or see a request."

When there were only two officials in the NBA, it was probably even more important for the administering official to not just focus on the inbound matchup. If he did, that would have left 8 players for his partner to watch!

When I say that the administering official "looks through" the inbounding matchup, I mean that they don't JUST focus on those two players. That would be a waste. They get wide enough to see their primary in addition to the inbounding action. You can't focus SOLELY on the inbounder, even if the count gets to 3 or 4 or you might miss something critical in your primary that your partners aren't going to get.

Z

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by zebraman

You can't focus SOLELY on the inbounder, even if the count gets to 3 or 4 or you might miss something critical in your primary that your partners aren't going to get.

Z

You mean like a request for a timeout?

[zebraman]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

You mean like a request for a timeout?

Amazingly, you can see a time-out request, even if you aren't staring directly at the inbounder and ignoring the other 9 players.

Z

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by zebraman

Amazingly, you can see a time-out request, even if you aren't staring directly at the inbounder and ignoring the other 9 players.

Z

Who said anything about ignoring any players?

Except you?

[zebraman]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

Who said anything about ignoring any players?

Except you?

Have a nice weekend.

Z

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by zebraman

I don't see any error on Bavetta's part. If the administering official is zoned in on the inbounder, he isn't helping his two partners out much. Looking through the inbounder to see other matchups is good officiating. With a loud crowd, the inbounder needs to make the time-out obvious.

Z

Z, forget about "helping your partners". The administering official has to be aware enough to anticipate a time out request in this sitch while continuing to referee the action on the floor. Obviously Bavetta believes this, if he didn't he would not have apologized.

[ChuckElias]

Has Bavetta said that he apologized for "missing" the TO? I don't put any credence in the player's story until I hear the official's story.