![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Again, I don't believe the committee intented to 1) make a distinction between intentional or flagrant contact on or against an AS and 2) insert the last phrase in 4-19-5-c to exempt dead ball intentional or flagrant contact from being a T under that condition, but rather to make it clear that contact against an AS was to be ignored unless intentional or flagrant. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I also give up. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
4-1-2 "The airborne shooter is considered to be in the act of shooting." See also 4.1.1 - the contact on the AS is neither intentional nor flagrant but is still a foul. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Lah me...... |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think 4-19-1 reads pretty clearly to say that until the shooter returns to the court, personal fouls apply - even if the ball is dead. I still can't imagine reasonable scenarios in which the ball would be dead and the shooter still airborne... another day! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
2. A1 jumps and shoots; A2 excessively swings elbows without making contact; ball becomes dead immediately; B1 fouls A2. (Less reasonable, but possible.)
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| questions re: | [email protected] | Baseball | 13 | Mon Jun 02, 2003 07:16am |
| PSK and IW Questions | mikesears | Football | 8 | Tue Jan 28, 2003 09:38am |
| Questions for Gee | Marty Rogers | Baseball | 11 | Sat May 25, 2002 01:34pm |
| 2 more questions | barney19 | Lacrosse | 2 | Tue May 07, 2002 10:12am |
| Questions to consider | Bfair | Baseball | 3 | Mon May 06, 2002 10:02pm |