![]() |
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Take aways
Quote:
Where I think we veer into different directions is the notion that you can build a predictable strategy based entirely on this approach. It's really the substance of whatever you're going to discuss with an official that will determine whether or not you might gain a sympathetic ear. Substance, not the form or manner. And so there's no real way, other than to be honest and earnest with the officials in the flow of the game. I think that some concepts, like ratcheting up the pressure on an inexperienced ref or backing off an experienced ref are not consistent with the "honest or earnest" approach. Picture a parent coming to a coaching forum looking for a tactful way to influence a coach about a team style of play that would definitely work to his kid's benefit. I wonder what kind of initial response he might get from the coaches. Or even more personal, how well would you take to a parent behind your bench strategically trying to engage you during the flow of a game, questioning your team's approach or making observations about might would work better? In the grand scheme of all things that influence the outcome of a game, I'd look first to turnovers, then to defensive rebounds, then to offensive rebounds, then to shooting percentages (missed lay-ups, free throws left at the line including missed front ends of 1&1's, etc.) Focus and improvement on all these factors have a much higher yield in the outcome of a game, making the need to "influence" the officials in your favor moot. Whenever a parent tells me the official blew a game for us, I can immediately point to the missed free throws, missed lay-ups, and turnovers and then blame our team for not taking care of business...
__________________
There are two kinds of fools: One says, “This is old, therefore it is good”; the other says, “This is new, therefore it is better.” - W.R. Inge |
| Bookmarks |
|
|