The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2005, 09:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally posted by johnny1784

IMO, an Official's pre-game with team captains should only be about; sportsmanship, team colors, boundary's, direction of play, unusual floor conditions, and if possible or optional, a very brief summary of this years points of emphasis that pertain to the players (intentional fouls, free throws, sporting behavior(covered in sportsmanship)etc.
I'm sorry, I stopped paying attention somewhere around boundaries. Can I go back to warming up now?
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2005, 11:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: N.D.
Posts: 1,829
When defending the post and the ball is elsewhere, I warn, "Keep your hands off." Out front, on the ball, no warning if it affects the dribbler.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 15, 2005, 01:25am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by johnny1784
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Stat-Man
ICBW, but I think there was an interpretation a few years back that said any touching of an opponent with a hand was supposed to be called as a foul.
You're absolutely right -- you really could be wrong.

Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
The POEs said that putting a hand on the dribbler was a foul.
I'm not even sure that's right, JR. I think the POE said that placing a hand on the dribbler and leaving it there was a foul. Or repeatedly "measuring up". I don't think merely touching the dribbler was mentioned as an automatic foul.
You are correct.
Oh?

Can either of you tell me in what year's NFHS POEs I might find those statements? I can find the following in POEs going back to the 2000-01 rule book, but I can't seem to find anything anywhere remotely resembling your assertations above.

2001-02 NFHS Rule Book- POE 4A- verbatim- "Defenders are not permitted to have hands on the DRIBBLER".

2002-03 NFHS Rule Book- POE 4A- verbatim- "Defenders are not permitted to have hands on the DRIBBLER".

2003-03 NFHS Rule Book- POE2A5- verbatim- "Regardless where it takes place on the floor, when a player CONTINUOUSLY places a hand on the OPPOSING PLAYER, it is a foul.".

I await elucidation.

Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 15, 2005, 01:40am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,533
Wink You have to read the entire thing.

In the 2002-2003 Rulebook says at the bottom of Letter A. Hand checking, "Principles involved in incidental contact (Rule 4-27) apply!"

In the 2003-2004 Rulebook there is a POE with hand checking. Under Letter A, #1 it says, "Any tactic using the hands, arms or body that allows a player on offense or defense to "control" (hold, impede, push, divert, slow, or prevent) the movement of an opposing player is a foul."

Then #4 says under says, "Any act or tactic of illegal use of hands, arms or body (offense or defense) that intentionally slows, prevents, impedes the progress or displaces an opposing player due to the contact, is a foul and must be called."

So it seems that in at least two rulebooks the NF was going out of their way to make it clear that a simple touch was not a foul. Hand checking is not defined as touching.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 16, 2005, 07:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 77
I remember a line from last year's discussion of this topic, and it went something like this:

If placing hands on the dribbler does not give the defender an distinct Advantage...then why would he do so?



Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 16, 2005, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,154
Quote:
Originally posted by carldog
I remember a line from last year's discussion of this topic, and it went something like this:

If placing hands on the dribbler does not give the defender an distinct Advantage...then why would he do so?



Hmm -- is the definition of "foul" something like "the defender gets and advantage" or is it something like "hinders the opponent's normal offensive or defensive maneuvers?"

Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 16, 2005, 06:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 77
I'm listening, Mr. Jenkins.

I get your point.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1