The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 12:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
43-2-a2 describes a single landing...one foot followed by the other. It doesn't describe two landings: landing, jumping and landing again.
Exactly!
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Thanks, rainmaker. You are absolutely right, travel rule does not apply when no dribbling is going on.
Huh?!?! The traveling rule only applies when there's no dribbling going on. It's not possible to travel when you're dribbling; so the travel rules only kick in when a player is NOT dribbling.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Thanks, rainmaker. You are absolutely right, travel rule does not apply when no dribbling is going on.
Huh?!?! The traveling rule only applies when there's no dribbling going on. It's not possible to travel when you're dribbling; so the travel rules only kick in when a player is NOT dribbling.
Got your attention again.

That is why I say "the harder I try to get myself out of a confusion, the deeper I am in it.".

Why no comments from you on my "real" misconceptions?

Thanks.


Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Thanks, rainmaker. You are absolutely right, travel rule does not apply when no dribbling is going on.
Huh?!?! The traveling rule only applies when there's no dribbling going on. It's not possible to travel when you're dribbling; so the travel rules only kick in when a player is NOT dribbling.
How come you can not understand no word out of my mouth?
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Huh?!?! The traveling rule only applies when there's no dribbling going on. It's not possible to travel when you're dribbling; so the travel rules only kick in when a player is NOT dribbling.
Why no comments from you on my "real" misconceptions?
I thought I just gave you one.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,169
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ysong
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
43-2-a2 describes a single landing...one foot followed by the other. It doesn't describe two landings: landing, jumping and landing again.
Exactly!
Camron is using "jump" differently than you are using it.

Camron is describing one type of jump stop -- land on one foot, jump, then land on both feet. That's described elsewhere in the rule.

You're describing a "normal" landing -- and that can be done with the first foot on the floor or with the first foot leaving the floor and then the second foot landing on the floor.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Now that a pivot foot is established, there are rules about what can happen.
I percieve the whole purpose of establishing a pivot foot is to allow a player to pivot, then what is the point to establish a pivot foot when that foot is no longer allowed to be pivoted on?

That is another reason why I feel the logic is twisted if 43-4-2-a(2) allows a "jump".

Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
[QUOTE]Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
43-2-a2 describes a single landing...one foot followed by the other. It doesn't describe two landings: landing, jumping and landing again.
Exactly!
Camron is using "jump" differently than you are using it.

Camron is describing one type of jump stop -- land on one foot, jump, then land on both feet. That's described elsewhere in the rule.
No he isn't. Ask him.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
just

take a really long blink when you think there will be a travelling violation so you dont see it

if you dont see it you cannot call it
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 02:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ysong
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
43-2-a2 describes a single landing...one foot followed by the other. It doesn't describe two landings: landing, jumping and landing again.
Exactly!
Camron is using "jump" differently than you are using it.

Camron is describing one type of jump stop -- land on one foot, jump, then land on both feet. That's described elsewhere in the rule.
No he isn't. Ask him.
Hmmm.... This is just a perfect example of how one sentence can have two opposite interpretations and both of them seem perfectly correct.

But the fact is, there can only be ONE correct interpretation.




Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 02:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Huh?!?! The traveling rule only applies when there's no dribbling going on. It's not possible to travel when you're dribbling; so the travel rules only kick in when a player is NOT dribbling.
Why no comments from you on my "real" misconceptions?
I thought I just gave you one.
Come on, Chuck. What makes you so sure about 43-2-a(2) allows a "jump"? I want to be convinced too.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 02:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
Imagine the following 3 scenarios:

A. A player catches a pass when he is in the air, lands on his left foot only, pauses, looks around, takes a drink, then put his right foot down.

B. A player catches a pass when he is in the air, lands on his left foot only, pauses, looks around, takes a drink, then "jumps" and lands on his right foot only.

C. A player catches a pass when he is in the air, lands on his left foot only, pauses, looks around, takes a drink, then "jumps" and lands on both feet.

Which one should I call travel?


[Edited by ysong on May 19th, 2005 at 03:30 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 03:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 85
Would you give a T for taking a drink during a live ball situation?

In option B does the player pass or shoot after that right foot comes down and the left has lifted.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 03:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 197
Quote:
Originally posted by TigerBball
Would you give a T for taking a drink during a live ball situation?

In option B does the player pass or shoot after that right foot comes down and the left has lifted.
The sequence after the drink is: left foot is lifted (player jumps off it), right foot down with ball still in hand. then the player waives to his mom and dad, while standing "single footed".

Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 04:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Cool depends what the drink was

water yes - shot of Tequila to calm down the star player absolutly not...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1