The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 12, 2005, 11:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally posted by justacoach
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
I may be out in left field on this, but I have a problem with a flop even if the defender is playing legal defense in every other regard. Just an example, a defender has LGP, he's moving backward while guarding (and still legal), but at the point of contact he intentionally flops--whether he goes to the floor or just flies back a step or two--to make the contact appear more severe than it actually was. If I can tell he's flopping, I do not want to give him the call on that.

This is exactly what I disagree with.

If the contact is worthy of a whistle on the dribbler you cannot take it away because you suspect the defender's "motives". I don't care if he launches himself backwards over your head doing the Dean-scream and lands in the 19th row. Give him the call.

Amen, Dan...
My patience is sorely tested every time one of my players, who have been taught extensively all the prerogatives they gain by first ESTABLISHING LGP, are called for blocks or no calls by officials who do not have a thorough knowledge of the actions allowed to MAINTAIN LGP. Do you think my 5'6 PG is not gonna use every nuance of the rules to avoid full contact from a driving 6'2 forward???
Sorry some of you guys are so insecure that you have to defend your honor and not let a 9th grader 'get over on you'.

What happened to the concept of rewarding good defense??

I think we all know a dead-up flop when we see it but any contact that displaces the defender in this sitch warrants a PC call even if you have the psychic powers to divine the defender started moving backwards prior to contact. Don't let a mere POE jaundice your judgement.
First of all, we're not in the business of rewarding anything. Good defense has it's own reward. But a player throwing himself to the ground to make a small contact look like a big one is not good defense. It's play acting.

I'm glad to hear that you're teaching your players about LGP. Honestly too few coaches even understand it, let alone teach their players about it.

But all that aside, how do you feel and how tested is that precious patience of your when one of your guys gets called for a PC when you think the other team's guard suffered some minor contact but mostly put on an oscar winning performance? Are you standing and applauding along with the other team's fans about their great defense? Or are you getting hot under the collar because their guy flopped and your guy got screwed by good acting?

How loud is your applause when that call that rewarded such "good defense" earned your star player his 5th foul in a close game? Is your applause all the louder still for believing that had the other team's actor not put on such a stellar performance, the contact probably would have been no-called?

And if perchance one of these little acting jobs gets you a little steamed, I'm sure you'll feel comforted to hear the official remind you to not be "so insecure that you have to defend your honor and not let a 9th grader 'get over on you'."

But perhaps I don't give you enough credit. After all, he had LGP and we are supposed to be rewarding good defense.

__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 12, 2005, 11:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Wisconsin
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by justacoach
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
I may be out in left field on this, but I have a problem with a flop even if the defender is playing legal defense in every other regard. Just an example, a defender has LGP, he's moving backward while guarding (and still legal), but at the point of contact he intentionally flops--whether he goes to the floor or just flies back a step or two--to make the contact appear more severe than it actually was. If I can tell he's flopping, I do not want to give him the call on that.

This is exactly what I disagree with.

If the contact is worthy of a whistle on the dribbler you cannot take it away because you suspect the defender's "motives". I don't care if he launches himself backwards over your head doing the Dean-scream and lands in the 19th row. Give him the call.

Amen, Dan...
My patience is sorely tested every time one of my players, who have been taught extensively all the prerogatives they gain by first ESTABLISHING LGP, are called for blocks or no calls by officials who do not have a thorough knowledge of the actions allowed to MAINTAIN LGP. Do you think my 5'6 PG is not gonna use every nuance of the rules to avoid full contact from a driving 6'2 forward???
Sorry some of you guys are so insecure that you have to defend your honor and not let a 9th grader 'get over on you'.

What happened to the concept of rewarding good defense??

I think we all know a dead-up flop when we see it but any contact that displaces the defender in this sitch warrants a PC call even if you have the psychic powers to divine the defender started moving backwards prior to contact. Don't let a mere POE jaundice your judgement.
He's allowed to move backwards. We're all talking about the situation where the defender helps himself to the floor or adds a little emphasis to the contact to try to buy a call. That you're not going to get, not from me.
I'll still call the PC....

...if the dribble still plows him over.

Just because he flops doesn't absolve the offense from actual contact.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser

I guess we disagree on this then. No biggy.
"....In a perfect world, this may be true. But in my world it's a game management nightmare to call the PC foul on the play where the defender "helps himself" to the floor. First, the offensive player and coach will think they can buy that call and people will be "helping themselves to the floor" the whole game. And the other coach will think you got fooled on the play.

No call, block, T, choose one. But when the defender helps himself to the floor or tries to embellish the contact, I'll NEVER call it a PC foul."



quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser


"...Sure, sure. Now I'll see this crap next season and they'll tell me that you didn't have a problem with it."

Rich....
I don't think I've seen anyone make that "auto-T" for a 'flop' this season.... (Agree on your statement re: game management!)

Hey....battle @ Watertown tonight....Catholic Central vs. Randolph for spot in next week's State Tournament.

wl



[Edited by imaref on Mar 12th, 2005 at 11:26 AM]
__________________
"All our calls are good calls...."
"...Some of them are better than others!"
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 12, 2005, 12:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,674
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by justacoach
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
I may be out in left field on this, but I have a problem with a flop even if the defender is playing legal defense in every other regard. Just an example, a defender has LGP, he's moving backward while guarding (and still legal), but at the point of contact he intentionally flops--whether he goes to the floor or just flies back a step or two--to make the contact appear more severe than it actually was. If I can tell he's flopping, I do not want to give him the call on that.

This is exactly what I disagree with.

If the contact is worthy of a whistle on the dribbler you cannot take it away because you suspect the defender's "motives". I don't care if he launches himself backwards over your head doing the Dean-scream and lands in the 19th row. Give him the call.

Amen, Dan...
My patience is sorely tested every time one of my players, who have been taught extensively all the prerogatives they gain by first ESTABLISHING LGP, are called for blocks or no calls by officials who do not have a thorough knowledge of the actions allowed to MAINTAIN LGP. Do you think my 5'6 PG is not gonna use every nuance of the rules to avoid full contact from a driving 6'2 forward???
Sorry some of you guys are so insecure that you have to defend your honor and not let a 9th grader 'get over on you'.

What happened to the concept of rewarding good defense??

I think we all know a dead-up flop when we see it but any contact that displaces the defender in this sitch warrants a PC call even if you have the psychic powers to divine the defender started moving backwards prior to contact. Don't let a mere POE jaundice your judgement.
He's allowed to move backwards. We're all talking about the situation where the defender helps himself to the floor or adds a little emphasis to the contact to try to buy a call. That you're not going to get, not from me.
I'll still call the PC....

...if the dribble still plows him over.

Just because he flops doesn't absolve the offense from actual contact.
Where in 4-23 does it say LGP is maintained as you are falling to the floor?

If you have this falling BEFORE the plowing through, you no-longer have LGP, and to call anything but a block is not supported by rules or common sense.

What are you calling if B1 is backpeddling and they trip and fall and then A1 lowers their shoulder to regain balance and falls over the prone B1?
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2005, 03:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust


I'll still call the PC....

...if the dribble still plows him over.

Just because he flops doesn't absolve the offense from actual contact.
Where in 4-23 does it say LGP is maintained as you are falling to the floor?

If you have this falling BEFORE the plowing through, you no-longer have LGP, and to call anything but a block is not supported by rules or common sense.

What are you calling if B1 is backpeddling and they trip and fall and then A1 lowers their shoulder to regain balance and falls over the prone B1?
Where does it say LGP is not maintained? Even so, there is no requirement for LGP for a PC foul. Common sense says that if B1's action does not increase or create the contact, B1 can't be guilty of a foul. All flopping usually does is decrease or eliminate the contact that would otherwise occur, if any. To call a block just because of a flop is more of a power statement...if you think you can fool me, I'll show you. I've tried the block route on a flop...it felt simply wrong.

If B1 is backpeddling and falls then A1 falls over him...nothing at all. B1 was already on the floor, the only contact was A1 falling over B1...and B1 is entitled to that spot. A1 got unlucky.

To add one more comment....

The difference in the latter case is when the contact occurs. If B1 is already on the ground by the time of contact, I agree, no PC. If B1 still takes contact in the torso in the process of falling...PC.

[Edited by Camron Rust on Mar 13th, 2005 at 03:14 AM]
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2005, 01:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,674
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust


I'll still call the PC....

...if the dribble still plows him over.

Just because he flops doesn't absolve the offense from actual contact.
Where in 4-23 does it say LGP is maintained as you are falling to the floor?

If you have this falling BEFORE the plowing through, you no-longer have LGP, and to call anything but a block is not supported by rules or common sense.

What are you calling if B1 is backpeddling and they trip and fall and then A1 lowers their shoulder to regain balance and falls over the prone B1?
Where does it say LGP is not maintained? Even so, there is no requirement for LGP for a PC foul. Common sense says that if B1's action does not increase or create the contact, B1 can't be guilty of a foul. All flopping usually does is decrease or eliminate the contact that would otherwise occur, if any. To call a block just because of a flop is more of a power statement...if you think you can fool me, I'll show you. I've tried the block route on a flop...it felt simply wrong.

If B1 is backpeddling and falls then A1 falls over him...nothing at all. B1 was already on the floor, the only contact was A1 falling over B1...and B1 is entitled to that spot. A1 got unlucky.

To add one more comment....

The difference in the latter case is when the contact occurs. If B1 is already on the ground by the time of contact, I agree, no PC. If B1 still takes contact in the torso in the process of falling...PC.

[Edited by Camron Rust on Mar 13th, 2005 at 03:14 AM]
There are reasons the FED wants it to be called a T. It's dangerous, especially in the lane area, and it's unsporting.

When I first started officiating Rodman was making the flop the norm in the NBA, and it trickled down to where coaches were teaching their players to do it. In our meetings we discussed how to handle it, and we all thought a T was too harsh, so an if you flop it's a block rule was installed.

Within 2 weeks flopping stopped, because we penalized the act uniformally. Whenever a coach would question a block with, "Where's the contact?" A simple, "Then why was your player on the floor?" Did the trick.

Now I know that is drastic, but flopping was happening much more in the early 90's than it is now.

It's a no-call from me more now, but I will call it a block if they hinder the offensive players path or landing with minimal contact, especially in the lane. Both the no-call and the block call are followed with a stop flopping warning. It's rare to ever have to call a block, on a flop, on that player again.

I'd like to see an official warning and then the T, that covers the entire team, just like the delay of game technical.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2005, 02:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Palmyra, VA
Posts: 245
Send a message via AIM to drothamel
Amen BITS. . .
__________________
-RESPECT THE GAME-
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2005, 03:39pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally posted by imaref
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by justacoach
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
I may be out in left field on this, but I have a problem with a flop even if the defender is playing legal defense in every other regard. Just an example, a defender has LGP, he's moving backward while guarding (and still legal), but at the point of contact he intentionally flops--whether he goes to the floor or just flies back a step or two--to make the contact appear more severe than it actually was. If I can tell he's flopping, I do not want to give him the call on that.

This is exactly what I disagree with.

If the contact is worthy of a whistle on the dribbler you cannot take it away because you suspect the defender's "motives". I don't care if he launches himself backwards over your head doing the Dean-scream and lands in the 19th row. Give him the call.

Amen, Dan...
My patience is sorely tested every time one of my players, who have been taught extensively all the prerogatives they gain by first ESTABLISHING LGP, are called for blocks or no calls by officials who do not have a thorough knowledge of the actions allowed to MAINTAIN LGP. Do you think my 5'6 PG is not gonna use every nuance of the rules to avoid full contact from a driving 6'2 forward???
Sorry some of you guys are so insecure that you have to defend your honor and not let a 9th grader 'get over on you'.

What happened to the concept of rewarding good defense??

I think we all know a dead-up flop when we see it but any contact that displaces the defender in this sitch warrants a PC call even if you have the psychic powers to divine the defender started moving backwards prior to contact. Don't let a mere POE jaundice your judgement.
He's allowed to move backwards. We're all talking about the situation where the defender helps himself to the floor or adds a little emphasis to the contact to try to buy a call. That you're not going to get, not from me.
I'll still call the PC....

...if the dribble still plows him over.

Just because he flops doesn't absolve the offense from actual contact.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser

I guess we disagree on this then. No biggy.
"....In a perfect world, this may be true. But in my world it's a game management nightmare to call the PC foul on the play where the defender "helps himself" to the floor. First, the offensive player and coach will think they can buy that call and people will be "helping themselves to the floor" the whole game. And the other coach will think you got fooled on the play.

No call, block, T, choose one. But when the defender helps himself to the floor or tries to embellish the contact, I'll NEVER call it a PC foul."



quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser


"...Sure, sure. Now I'll see this crap next season and they'll tell me that you didn't have a problem with it."

Rich....
I don't think I've seen anyone make that "auto-T" for a 'flop' this season.... (Agree on your statement re: game management!)

Hey....battle @ Watertown tonight....Catholic Central vs. Randolph for spot in next week's State Tournament.

wl



[Edited by imaref on Mar 12th, 2005 at 11:26 AM]
I was going to go to this game, but ended up watching the Badgers on TV and then stayed home. 20 point game, but was Randolph 17-0 after the first quarter followed by a 14-0 Catholic Central run. In the game I had Catholic Central, they fell behind 8 to Abundant Life in the first quarter before putting them away. Eventually those slow starts catch up with you.

Thought about heading down to the Kohl Center to watch some of the girls' tourney, but my wife needed some assistance with the baby last night at home.

It'll be different watching those 3-person crews on TV next season. 'Bout time.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2005, 10:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 322
Whacked someone for flopping today. Had warned him once earlier. In the middle of the lane, absolutely NO CONTACT, not even slight contact, A1 does a pancake kicking his legs out and landing face first. It didn't even make sense that someone would be "pushed" like that. B2 was coming down the lane as well and had I not blown the play dead may have had to jump over him. To top it all off, he gave me a look asking where the call was.

When I gave him "the call" he and his team went ballastic, letting me know there was no rule against flopping. They assured me that rule was only in hockey (is it? Not a hockey fan here...).

Ironically, the team lost by one point. The flop technical was mid-way through the first half but of course they started cussing me out after the game blaming my made up technical foul on their loss. I simply sat at the table taking numbers down.

This same bunch of goofballs got called for a really easy 5 second call, when they let me know the person has to be right up next to them and not if they are a few feet away. I asked what rule they were referencing, they told me to watch basketball, that its called like that. I smiled and moved down court.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 13, 2005, 10:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Wisconsin
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
[/B]
I was going to go to this game, but ended up watching the Badgers on TV and then stayed home. 20 point game, but was Randolph 17-0 after the first quarter followed by a 14-0 Catholic Central run. In the game I had Catholic Central, they fell behind 8 to Abundant Life in the first quarter before putting them away. Eventually those slow starts catch up with you.

Thought about heading down to the Kohl Center to watch some of the girls' tourney, but my wife needed some assistance with the baby last night at home.

It'll be different watching those 3-person crews on TV next season. 'Bout time.
[/QUOTE]
Rich...
My partner and I went over to Fort Atkinson HS Friday night to watch Randolph vs. Racine Lutheran. It was a pretty good game to watch....Randolph started slow with the game very similar to the game we had when they played Wayland Acadamy. There was a better match up in personnel...but the Lutheran slow down failed to stay disiplined and Randolph got Lutheran into a run game and it was over. I didn't think Randolph (Sat. nite) would have as easy a game with Catholic Central with all the news reports about their big player John Henney. Apparently he got into foul trouble and his replacement wasn't a good match for Tillema. It appears Randolph will get its 4th State title in a row!

Three crew couldn't come soon enough! I may get an opportunity to get to the KOHL to catch some games. My partner may get his brother's tickets...if so, I'd like to catch Randolph one last time....but hope to see Madison Memorial and Beloit Memorial if possible. Thought I'd get a chance to see my 'ol Alma Mater....Janesville Craig get to State....but Beloit held all the cards Saturday night. Felt bad about Elkhorn missing out too! (We've got Madison Memorial v. Madison West next year on our schedule). Hope Boyce Hodge has mellowed out since his tirade last year. Heard he made some negative statements about the officials who had that game. He seemed to be a good guy when I met him at last October's WBCA Hall of Fame dinner. He and his wife sat at the same table with me. He thought I looked too young to be receiving my 30 year plaque from WBCA. Guess my "bald" head makes me look younger????

Oh well....time to relax and do my NCAA brackets and wean myself from basketball officiating for another season until the summer camps and "sweat leagues".

Take care...maybe we'll bump into each other in Madison this weekend!

wl

[Edited by imaref on Mar 13th, 2005 at 11:01 PM]
__________________
"All our calls are good calls...."
"...Some of them are better than others!"
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 14, 2005, 06:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,011
Quote:
Originally posted by bradfordwilkins
Whacked someone for flopping today.
Me too.
7th grade CYO tournament championship game.
Kid put both arms up in the air and fell backwards as if he were going to make a snow angel. (I think I am going to use the "snow angel" as my standard for a flopping T.) There wasn't any contact with the dribbler who simply went around him and laid it in. I withheld the whistle until the lay-up was made then T'd him.

His team lost by 1.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 14, 2005, 09:38am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally posted by imaref
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
I was going to go to this game, but ended up watching the Badgers on TV and then stayed home. 20 point game, but was Randolph 17-0 after the first quarter followed by a 14-0 Catholic Central run. In the game I had Catholic Central, they fell behind 8 to Abundant Life in the first quarter before putting them away. Eventually those slow starts catch up with you.

Thought about heading down to the Kohl Center to watch some of the girls' tourney, but my wife needed some assistance with the baby last night at home.

It'll be different watching those 3-person crews on TV next season. 'Bout time.
Rich...
My partner and I went over to Fort Atkinson HS Friday night to watch Randolph vs. Racine Lutheran. It was a pretty good game to watch....Randolph started slow with the game very similar to the game we had when they played Wayland Acadamy. There was a better match up in personnel...but the Lutheran slow down failed to stay disiplined and Randolph got Lutheran into a run game and it was over. I didn't think Randolph (Sat. nite) would have as easy a game with Catholic Central with all the news reports about their big player John Henney. Apparently he got into foul trouble and his replacement wasn't a good match for Tillema. It appears Randolph will get its 4th State title in a row!

Three crew couldn't come soon enough! I may get an opportunity to get to the KOHL to catch some games. My partner may get his brother's tickets...if so, I'd like to catch Randolph one last time....but hope to see Madison Memorial and Beloit Memorial if possible. Thought I'd get a chance to see my 'ol Alma Mater....Janesville Craig get to State....but Beloit held all the cards Saturday night. Felt bad about Elkhorn missing out too! (We've got Madison Memorial v. Madison West next year on our schedule). Hope Boyce Hodge has mellowed out since his tirade last year. Heard he made some negative statements about the officials who had that game. He seemed to be a good guy when I met him at last October's WBCA Hall of Fame dinner. He and his wife sat at the same table with me. He thought I looked too young to be receiving my 30 year plaque from WBCA. Guess my "bald" head makes me look younger????

Oh well....time to relax and do my NCAA brackets and wean myself from basketball officiating for another season until the summer camps and "sweat leagues".

Take care...maybe we'll bump into each other in Madison this weekend!

wl

[Edited by imaref on Mar 13th, 2005 at 11:01 PM] [/B][/QUOTE]

I have some comments about the Boyce incident, but I think they are better addressed by email. I'll send them to you if I get a chance this week. But I will say that I'd work there and work for Boyce anytime. I worked one of his games against Memorial last season at West. Even though they ended up losing the game, Boyce was very gracious to us before, during, and after the game. I have West again next season, hosting Parker on a Saturday afternoon.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1