The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 16, 2001, 12:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Just Curious
On the Intentional foul, being his fifth, he was disqualified from the contest. Now being disqualified and considered bench personell, would the 2nd "T" be considered an indirect to the Head Coach?
When a player receives his 5th foul, you must notify the coach and then the player. If the coach had not yet been notified, it is not an indirect on the coach.

In this case, it appears the T was called before the coach was notified.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 16, 2001, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
2nd T

Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Watson
If you notified the coach.
..."if you notified the coach", prior to giving the disqualified player a "T". Then the player is considered bench personnel, thus the Coach gets an indirect "T".

I know you understand this Brian, just trying to clear it up for us Rookies.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 16, 2001, 02:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,051
Sorry, thought I had first in there.

If you notify the coach first, before banging him, then yes, it is an indirect.

Which raises and interesting possibility.

Let's say the kid tells you to go get bent. You know you are going to wahck him, but you wait 2 extra seconds to tell the coach it is his 5th. Then wack, it is an indirect.

Unethical, but within the rules?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 17, 2001, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Watson
Sorry, thought I had first in there.

If you notify the coach first, before banging him, then yes, it is an indirect.

Which raises and interesting possibility.

Let's say the kid tells you to go get bent. You know you are going to wahck him, but you wait 2 extra seconds to tell the coach it is his 5th. Then wack, it is an indirect.

Unethical, but within the rules?
I think that because the offense occured before the DQ, it shouldn't matter when the T is charged.

Of course, we all know the saying about opinions.
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 17, 2001, 09:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,069
RE: Brian's Ethics

Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Watson
Unethical, but within the rules?
I know I would grin while this thought crossed my mind, BUT I would stick with the "T" before the notification. I believe that is in the spirit of the game AND you do not lower yourself to the same type of conduct. Remain professional.
__________________
"Stay in the game!"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1