The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 23, 2004, 08:50pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
[/B]

So I'll state again my interpretation of the pro philosophy: if two players contact the shooter (happens all the time), and if the difference in contact is not that great (and usually, it's not), and if the official is aware of the fouls on each of the players, then the guy with fewer fouls will probably get the foul.

[/B][/QUOTE]Didn't you also add that "the guy with fewer fouls will probably get the foul unless he happens to be a star? Do you agree with that part of the pro philosophy?
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 23, 2004, 08:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Re: Re: Re: Just my two cents.

Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
I do not do this to "distribute" fouls or not to call fouls all together.
Who ever said anything about "not calling fouls altogether"? Where did you and Eric come up with that? NOBODY is saying that you should not call a foul when the shooter is fouled. I would never say that, and it's obvious that pro officials do NOT subscribe to that philosophy.

Quote:
If a star clearly fouls another player, he is getting called for it regardless

So what happens if the star player and another defender foul the shooter at the same time? They both obviously foul him. Are you going to call a multiple foul? No way, right? So if you know -- for whatever reason -- that one of the players has 3 fouls and the other only has one foul, who do you call the foul on?

I'm not trying to be argumentative. I'm just trying to make my point as clearly as possible. What you said in your previous post is the same thing I'm saying.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 23, 2004, 08:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Didn't you also add that "the guy with fewer fouls will probably get the foul unless he happens to be a star?
No, I don't think I did. . .
_________________________________________
[Edit] Oh, ok, the Luke Walton crack. That's why I threw "probably" in there. Remember, we're distributing the fouls to keep the stars in the game, if possible.

[Edited by ChuckElias on Apr 23rd, 2004 at 10:05 PM]
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 23, 2004, 09:06pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Blindzebra's quote was "Chuck is talking about taking one for the team. If two defenders are there, the one with the fewer fouls gets the foul. Who hit A harder or first does NOT enter the picture".
And I said he's exactly right. Ok, I see your point. I took him to be speaking generally, about the normal course of play, like the usual situation where a shooter gets hit by two defenders at roughly the same time with about the same amount of contact. You took him literally to mean that the level of contact never matters.

If you look way back on p2, he was answering a very plain, literal and specific question that I put forth- i.e. "Do you take into account that the contact from one player may be stronger than another, and that this contact rarely occurs exactly simultaneously?".As per his answer above relating to that question, he replied that it DOES NOT matter who hit the player harder or first. You just give the foul to the player who has he fewer fouls. That's what you agreed with, Chuck. I took him literally because that was his answer to a literal and specific question.
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 23, 2004, 09:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,674
Quote:
Originally posted by Snaqwells
Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra
Quote:
Originally posted by Snaqwells
I'm not convinced the philosophy should be used in HS at all. Some refs have the awareness, but choose not to call a game this way.

Why, if you apply it consistently?
Simple. I don't think hs ball should be about the stars. For those players who are going to move on to higher levels, it doesn't do them much good to give them "star" treatment. It also doesn't do them any good to help them get more than 5 fouls in a game, regardless of whether they are stars or not. I think for me it's an instructional thing.
I agree with Rut, that we should make sure the last couple are obvious, but if the guy with four fouls comes in and hacks the offensive player, followed by a teammate doing the same thing; I'll be calling the first foul, because that's the rule.

Unless, of course, my assignor wants it done differently.
Where did I say anything about not giving it to the "star" player, I said, "If I am aware that one player has more fouls and they both contact A1 at about the same time and you don't have one player killing A1, I'm giving the foul to the kid with fewer fouls."

As for calling the first foul, by rule you should call BOTH FOULS if it is on an airborne shooter.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 23, 2004, 09:17pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Didn't you also add that "the guy with fewer fouls will probably get the foul unless he happens to be a star?
No, I don't think I did. . .
_________________________________________
[Edit] Oh, ok, the Luke Walton crack. That's why I threw "probably" in there. Remember, we're distributing the fouls to keep the stars in the game, if possible.

Yes, Chuck, you did say that. You were basically saying that there IS a "star" system in place in the NBA then, and that the "fewer foul" philosophy doesn't really apply to the stars- only the average players? No wonder it's such a tough game to referee,eh?
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 23, 2004, 09:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
That's what you agreed with, Chuck. I took him literally because that was his answer to a literal and specific question.
You're right. I already said I should not have agreed "exactly" with the way blindzebra worded it. Uncle!

However, in everything I've said since then, is the "pro philosophy" at least now clear?
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 23, 2004, 09:30pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias

However, in everything I've said since then, is the "pro philosophy" at least now clear?

[/B]
Yeah, I think so. And as the NBA is mainly an "entertainment" league, I can't really say that the pro philosophy is wrong. I also could never,ever say that the officials were wrong in carrying out their league mandate. They don't have a choice. Has to be hard sometimes, though. Too much thinking involved.

I do think that that particular "pro" philosophy has no place in high school ball though, but I also don't think that you were advocating that anyway.I think that you and JRut might actually be pretty close in what you were trying to say. Which is that the last foul on a "good" player should also be a "good" foul. Or am I wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 25, 2004, 10:54pm
Whack! Get Out!!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 1,029
Quote:
Originally posted by ace
Like you have room to talk Brad... What time did you get up this morning? LOL You working Kingwood Tourny this weekend?
Don't be jealous because I can work from home while you are in class all day!!

I was not scheduled to work the tournament this weekend because I had some family and friends in town... However, BBall_Junkie had to call me in at the last minute to come take care of some business! Many fouls and three technicals later we got things under control!
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 26, 2004, 07:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally posted by Brad
Quote:
Originally posted by ace
Like you have room to talk Brad... What time did you get up this morning? LOL You working Kingwood Tourny this weekend?
Don't be jealous because I can work from home while you are in class all day!!

I was not scheduled to work the tournament this weekend because I had some family and friends in town... However, BBall_Junkie had to call me in at the last minute to come take care of some business! Many fouls and three technicals later we got things under control!
It was either call you in or work the championship by myself because my co-official for the previous six games punked out on me. So it was call you in since you live up the road or work it by myself. After I thought this through long and hard, I decided that having you there would be slightly better than going it alone.

Just kidding! Thanks for the help. We had our share of PAB's in that game for sure
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 26, 2004, 10:18pm
ace ace is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 530
Send a message via AIM to ace
I had a coach tell me he was going to f me up as long with sevearl other things. I was working with J. Lopez and T. Robinson. :shakes head: Steve and the Tourny director eventually gave him the the heave ho for the rest of the tourny. Some of those people were just stupid. I got asked to come back in July so iwas excited. Finally got to wear my stinking gray shirts. Had a 4 game stretch to finsih off the ngiht saturday. Damian said BBall_junkie dropped quite a few T's friday night. I had my fair share this weekend. So much for not wanting to give any. Hanging on the rim for no reason... F bomb... back talking... Gave a coach two really good stop signs I went up the floor and came back down again and he was still talking about the play so I rung him up. Wish I coulda seen what the score was and how much time there was left before I done it though. Anyway... glad we all had some fun. FYI - I ran 3-man all week... Whos going to San Antonio for Stigs camp besides me?
__________________
John "acee" A.
Recently got a DWI - Driving With Icee.
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 27, 2004, 09:15am
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
Quote:
Originally posted by ace
I had a coach tell me he was going to f me up as long with sevearl other things. I was working with J. Lopez and T. Robinson. :shakes head: Steve and the Tourny director eventually gave him the the heave ho for the rest of the tourny. Some of those people were just stupid. I got asked to come back in July so iwas excited. Finally got to wear my stinking gray shirts. Had a 4 game stretch to finsih off the ngiht saturday. Damian said BBall_junkie dropped quite a few T's friday night. I had my fair share this weekend. So much for not wanting to give any. Hanging on the rim for no reason... F bomb... back talking... Gave a coach two really good stop signs I went up the floor and came back down again and he was still talking about the play so I rung him up. Wish I coulda seen what the score was and how much time there was left before I done it though. Anyway... glad we all had some fun. FYI - I ran 3-man all week... Whos going to San Antonio for Stigs camp besides me?
Am I missing something?
Was this meant to be a PM?
Can someone translate?

Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 27, 2004, 09:24am
Whack! Get Out!!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 1,029
Don't worry tomegun -- we can barely understand ace in person!!!
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 27, 2004, 04:33pm
ace ace is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 530
Send a message via AIM to ace
I never can get my personal messaging thing to work, probably should have emailed it. I figured with this for at the bottom of the thread and only Brad and BBall posting It'd be safe to talk about a tournament that most of officials from Houston worked this weekend.
__________________
John "acee" A.
Recently got a DWI - Driving With Icee.
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 27, 2004, 05:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally posted by ace
I had a coach tell me he was going to f me up as long with sevearl other things.
Coach - let me be the first to say farewell.

Somewhat shockingly, I've never been threatened at rec sports games - if I ever were, the player would be ejected, and campus police would be getting a nice little call.
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1