Blood Quiz Question

[bob jenkins]

Maybe an (another) example of "getting credit" vs. "knowing the rule":

The officials discover blood on A1's jersey and a bleeding cut on B1. What is the correct procedure?

A. A1 & B1 can take as long as necessary to get the blood situation cleared up and remain in the game.

B. If one coach calls timeout, both players may remain in game as long as blood is cleaned up, and the wound is covered by the end of timeout.

C. Either coach or both coaches may call a timeout before the end of the replacement interval in order to keep their player in the game.

D. None of the above.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Maybe an (another) example of "getting credit" vs. "knowing the rule": The officials discover blood on A1's jersey and a bleeding cut on B1. What is the correct procedure?

C. Either coach or both coaches may call a timeout before the end of the replacement interval in order to keep their player in the game.

What do I win?

"A set of encyclopedias, a case of Turtle Wax, and a year's supply of Rice-A-Roni"?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

C. Either coach or both coaches may call a timeout before the end of the replacement interval in order to keep their player in the game.

What do I win?

"A set of encyclopedias, a case of Turtle Wax, and a year's supply of Rice-A-Roni"?

See note 2 at the top of page 26 of the rules book.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

See note 2 at the top of page 26 of the rules book.

3-3-7-Note- 2: A time-out granted to keep a player in the game must be requested before the replacement interval begins.

Too bad, I was really looking forward to that year's supply of Rice-A-Roni.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

3-3-7-Note-2: A time-out granted to keep a player in the game must be requested before the replacement interval begins.

I'd like blue cheese dressing on this word salad.

I'm not sure what this means?

A1 has blood on his jersey. Team A head coach uses twenty seconds to try to remove the blood. After the twenty seconds ends he has failed to fully remove all the blood, and then he requests a thirty second timeout, is then successful in completely removing the blood just as the thirty second timeout ends, and then he expects to keep A1 in the game.

How does 3-3-7-Note-2 impact this situation, if it actually does have an impact?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

A1 has blood on his jersey. Team A head coach uses twenty seconds to try to remove the blood. After the twenty seconds ends he has failed to fully remove all the blood, and then he requests a thirty second timeout, is then successful in completely removing the blood just as the thirty second timeout ends, and then he expects to keep A1 in the game.

A1 can remain in the game.

A has 20 seconds to remove the blood. At the end of the 20 seconds (if the blood is not removed) the coach must choose sub or TO. If he chooses sub, then the replacement interval begins. The coach now CAN NOT be granted a TO until the sub come in.

It's all the same as last year, except there's an additional 20-second period at the front for the coach to decide (and try to clean the blood).