![]() |
|
|||
Point of Interruption--Throw-in Location
I know at one time the NCAA-Men's rule said that if we had a double foul away from the from ball, the POI throw-in would be a designated spot nearest the location of the ball.
I know this because I had this debate in a D1 staff camp about a decade or so ago and I emailed the rule to my partners. Now the case play (A.R. 270) says the location for the POI throw-in would be the spot nearest the foul. Does anybody know when this changed? Just verified in the high school rule book the location of the throw-in is a designated spot nearest where the ball was located. I have sent an email to Art Hyland. Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Mon Feb 07, 2022 at 11:58pm. |
|
|||
Didn't know it changed or that it was never the place where the ball was located just like high school. Yeah, I would like to hear what Art has to say about that. I wonder if it is just an oversight.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
It seems to be shown as a change in this year's role book:
Art. 8. After any double personal or technical fouls or any simultaneous personal or technical fouls committed when there is team control and neither foul is a flagrant foul, play shall resume with a throw-in from a designated spot nearest to where the foul occurred using the procedures in Rule 7-3.2. |
|
|||
Apparently. Noticed it yesterday when I was posting portions of the latest NCAA-Men's bulletin to my HS association FB page. I always make sure to note any conflicts with NFHS rules. I was totally surprised.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Tue Feb 08, 2022 at 11:07am. |
|
|||
Art Hyland has posted a correction.
"1. Paragraph 2 of the Bulletin – The “Ruling” in the Play Situation is incorrect. Replace with the following: Ruling – There shall be no free throws awarded. (Rule 7-3.1.i) Play shall resume with a throw-in by Team A at a designated spot nearest to the point of interruption. This ruling is based on the definition of “Point of Interruption”. The POI is determined by the location of the ball at the time of the interruption and the team in control. 2. Rules Book Corrections A. Rule 7-4.7 - Delete “nearest to where the foul occurred.” B. Rule 7-4.8 - Delete “nearest to where the foul occurred.” Since both Articles include the types of fouls that are covered in Rule 4-28.1 “Point of Interruption”, the resumption of play should be based on team control and the location of the ball at the time of interruption and not the location where the foul occurred. Thanks to all of you who took the time to point out these errors." Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Point of Interruption or Not? | tw1ns | Basketball | 26 | Tue Jan 31, 2012 09:09pm |
Point of Interruption | PIAA REF | Basketball | 6 | Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:19am |
What is point of interruption ? | bossref | Basketball | 13 | Thu Dec 12, 2002 03:17pm |
"point of interruption" | Rhino | Basketball | 1 | Fri Dec 08, 2000 06:11pm |
Point of Interruption | kspann | Basketball | 12 | Thu Nov 30, 2000 11:48am |