The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 08, 2022, 10:24am
wife loves the goatee...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Beach
Posts: 255
Jump Ball rules help

NFHS

At a small, local clinic last night our clinician stated that "when a jump ball is tipped out of bounds untouched by any other player, the jump ball is redone".

I have searched the rule book and cannot find a specific rule (other than if BOTH jumpers simultaneously tip the ball- 9.6 p59) that applies.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 08, 2022, 11:18am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Time to elect a new rules interpreter.

Or, being generous, he meant to imply the ball was tipped by both jumpers.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 08, 2022, 11:37am
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
An Archaic Forgettable Anachronistic Formality ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond View Post
...he meant to imply the ball was tipped by both jumpers.
Agree with Raymond. Poorly worded.

Jump ball simultaneously tipped/tapped by both jumpers directly (no touch by nonjumpers) out of bounds. Leave the clock alone (time should have ticked down a little after legal touch). New jump ball between same two jumpers.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)

Last edited by BillyMac; Tue Nov 08, 2022 at 02:12pm.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 08, 2022, 06:19pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Alternate ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRJ1960 View Post
... "when a jump ball is tipped out of bounds untouched by any other player, the jump ball is redone".
Only jumper A1 tips/taps tossed ball directly (no touch by nonjumpers) out of bounds. Out of bounds off of A1. Team B gets the ball for inbounds pass where the ball went out of bounds. Next alternating possession goes to Team A.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 08, 2022, 07:14pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
No Arrow ...

Jump ball tipped/tapped by both jumpers, A1 and B1 (doesn't matter who tipped/tapped first or second). Two nonjumpers, A2 and B2, simultaneously touch the ball (no player control, no possession) before it goes out of bounds. New jump ball between A2 and B2.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 08, 2022, 09:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Rockville,MD
Posts: 1,139
If it wasn't simultaneously touched by both teams, the team that did not tip the ball out of bounds gets possession. The opponent gets the alternating possession arrow.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 09, 2022, 12:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 1,198
Well dont be shocked. Our state interpreter doesnt know that the elbow contact intentional/flagrant "rule" doesnt exist in the rule book/case book.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 09, 2022, 12:47pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
One And Done ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB View Post
Our state interpreter doesn't know that the elbow contact intentional/flagrant "rule" doesn't exist in the rule book/case book.
I believe that SNIPERBBB is correct.

Contact Above The Shoulders only appeared as a "one and done" Point Of Emphasis, and except for a minor rule change, never fully appeared in the rulebook and/or casebook.

2012-13 Points Of Emphasis Contact Above The Shoulders
With a continued emphasis on reducing concussions and decreasing excessive contact situations the committee determined that more guidance is needed for penalizing contact above the shoulders. A player shall not swing his/her arm(s) or elbow(s) even without contacting an opponent. Excessive swinging of the elbows occurs when arms and elbows are swung about while using the shoulders as pivots, and the speed of the extended arms and elbows is in excess of the rest of the body as it rotates on the hips or on the pivot foot.
Examples of illegal contact above the shoulders and resulting penalties.
1. Contact with a stationary elbow may be incidental or a common foul.
2. An elbow in movement but not excessive should be an intentional foul.
3. A moving elbow that is excessive can be either an intentional foul or flagrant personal foul.


While I personally believe that the "specifics" of this Point Of Emphasis are still valid, how is an official with less than ten years of experience suppose to know these parameters?

Here's the rule change (two years later).

2014-15 NFHS Basketball Rules Changes
4-19-3-D: An intentional foul is a personal or technical foul that may or may not be premeditated and is not based solely on the severity of the act. Intentional fouls include, but are not limited to: Excessive contact with an opponent while the ball is live or until an airborne shooter returns to the floor.


Here's the rationale behind the rule change.

The rules committee also expanded the definition of an intentional foul in Rule 4-19-3d, which now states that an intentional foul is “excessive contact with an opponent while the ball is live or until an airborne shooter returns to the floor.” ... this revision will address the issue of contact with the elbow and should reduce the subjectivity in making rulings on intentional fouls.

Personally, while I believe that the 2012-13 Contact Above The Shoulders Point Of Emphasis is still valid (especially for experienced veterans that were around ten years ago), I don't believe that the 2014-15 NFHS Basketball Rules Change went far enough to explain the "specifics" of the Contact Above The Shoulders parameters, especially for officials with less than ten years of experience.

Of course, those experienced enough to be appointed/elected as interpreters/trainers should be "aware" of the "specifics" of the Contact Above The Shoulders parameters, and teach such to all officials, both experienced and inexperienced. However the lack of these specific parameters permanently ensconced in the rulebook and/or casebook could lead to the purpose and intent of this Point Of Emphasis "falling through the cracks".
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)

Last edited by BillyMac; Wed Nov 09, 2022 at 01:13pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 09, 2022, 01:53pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Casebook Plays ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB View Post
Our state interpreter doesn't know that the elbow contact intentional/flagrant "rule" doesn't exist in the rule book/case book.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
I believe that SNIPERBBB is correct. Contact Above The Shoulders only appeared as a "one and done" Point Of Emphasis, and except for a minor rule change, never fully appeared in the rulebook and/or casebook.
I now believe that I, and SNIPERBBB were partially wrong. There are casebook plays regarding Contact Above The Shoulders,

4.19.3 SITUATION F: After a rebound, A1, while holding the ball, pivots and A1’s elbow contacts B1 above the shoulders. A1's elbow is violently and excessively swung at a speed in excess of the player’s torso. RULING: If the contact is violent or excessive, a flagrant foul shall be called. (4-27, 4-19-2, 4-19-3, 4-19-4)

9.13.1 SITUATION B: A1 is trapped in the corner by B1 and B2, who are in legal guarding position. In an attempt to create space, A1 rapidly swings arms/elbows while using the shoulders as pivots (a) without making contact; (b) making contact with an opponent above the shoulders and elbows are moving faster than the body. RULING: In (a), A1 excessively swinging arms/elbows without contacting the opponent is a violation. Team B is awarded a designated spot throw-in nearest the violation. In (b), this is considered an intentional foul. (9-13-1)

9.13.2 SITUATION: A5 catches the ball on a rebound, “chins” the ball and then turns (with the elbow at the same speed as the body) to make an outlet pass with the elbow leading the way. Prior to releasing the ball, A1’s elbow contacts B5 above the shoulders. RULING: This may be ruled incidental contact or a player control foul.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)

Last edited by BillyMac; Wed Nov 09, 2022 at 01:55pm.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 09, 2022, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 1,198
I don't think those case plays were pointed out at all in in the state meetings this year or last. And technically still not in the Rules

Last edited by SNIPERBBB; Wed Nov 09, 2022 at 02:38pm.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 09, 2022, 02:45pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
They Exist ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB View Post
I don't think those case plays were pointed out at all in in the state meetings this year or last. And technically still not in the Rules
But the three caseplays still exist, even if not "pointed out".

These three caseplays combined with the new language in 4-19-3-D should suffice.

But I would still like to see more "specifics" in the rulebook.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)

Last edited by BillyMac; Wed Nov 09, 2022 at 03:37pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jump ball held ball plus injury. Sharpshooternes Basketball 16 Tue Dec 31, 2013 05:25pm
Jump ball-Held Ball (Video) JRutledge Basketball 21 Mon Sep 09, 2013 09:54pm
Those crazy Jump Ball rules Adam Basketball 23 Thu Dec 17, 2009 04:36pm
Question -- Jump ball right after opening Jump ball bradfordwilkins Basketball 9 Tue Feb 22, 2005 03:42pm
Jump Ball: Possession Arrow vs. Actual Jump Ball KingTripleJump Basketball 21 Thu Feb 12, 2004 08:47am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1