Backcourt Violation Editorial Change

[Freddy]

If you really want to delve into depths of the somewhat twisted logic and reasoning behind the original debacle that caused it all and a correct understanding of the NFHS attempt at clarity all the way up to the expanded EXCEPTION stated in this year's rules book under 9-9-1, here's a tutorial that explains it in detail. Watch from the :56 second mark to 3:29 minute mark. Includes videos to illustrate what's legal. Not updated to accomodate the new phraseology in the new rules book because that really didn't add anything to what is legal anyway.

[SC Official]

Yeah, the NFHS tends to mess things up then fumble through making the correction as they don't want to admit that they messed it up to begin with.

The interpretation that led to the rule "change" last year was bogus to begin with and everyone knew it.

All they had to do was redact the interpretation, but they couldn't do that. Would make too much sense.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Yeah, the NFHS tends to mess things up then fumble through making the correction as they don't want to admit that they messed it up to begin with.

The interpretation that led to the rule "change" last year was bogus to begin with and everyone knew it.

All they had to do was redact the interpretation, but they couldn't do that. Would make too much sense.

When you get a woman to admit that she was wrong, let me know!