|
|||
Let's go to the videotape
A throw-back for all you Warner Wolf fans out there.
Retired HS ref with a NCAA rules question. 5 minutes left in the 2nd half and A1 makes a shot attempt with the shot clock expiring just after he shoots. Officials rule the shot grazed the rim, thus avoiding a violation. Under what circumstances can/should officials go to video to review whether or not the shot did in fact touch the rim? Does that determination to review ever become automatic (e.g., with 2 minutes or less left in the half)? TIA |
|
|||
Quote:
Rufus: Just for clarification: Did you mean to say that A1's FGA was not successful but did touch the basket ring? Only an bald old geezer like myself would have recognized the Warner Wolf reference, . MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio |
|
|||
Quote:
Warner Wolf was the ESPN of his time for sure! |
|
|||
Quote:
As for monitor review, you can only go to see if the shot was released prior to expiration of the shot clock on a made basket. You cannot use the monitor to determine if the ball hit the ring. 11-2-1.b.4 Determine if the ball was released on a try for goal before the sounding of the shot clock horn when the try is successful. The officials must recognize the potential mistake and signal to the scorer that an instant replay review is required prior to the ball next becoming live. When the try is unsuccessful, a review is not permissible.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
A.R. 350. In a game with an official courtside monitor, A1 attempts a try with 15 seconds remaining on the shot clock. The try did not contact the ring or flange and Team A regained control. However, the shot-clock operator reset the shot clock. (1) The official blows the whistle and confers with their partners, and they determine that the ball did not hit the ring and the shot clock was mistakenly reset. The officials have definite information relative to the time that was on the shot clock when it was reset. As a result, the officials decide not to use the courtside monitor. (2) The official blows the whistle and confers with their partners and they are unable to determine whether the shot clock was improperly reset. The referee decides to go to the monitor to determine whether a timing mistake occurred. Are the officials required to use the courtside monitor in these situations? RULING: (1) No. The officials are not required to use the monitor since they agree that the ball did not hit the ring. Since the officials have definite information relative to the time that was on the shot clock before it was mistakenly reset, they shall instruct the shot-clock operator to place the correct time on the shot clock and play shall be resumed at the point of interruption. (2) No. By rule, the officials are not required to use the monitor. However, since the officials are unable to determine if the shot clock was improperly reset, they are permitted to use the monitor to make this determination. When it is determined that the shot clock was mistakenly reset, they are permitted to put the correct time back on the shot clock. When it is determined that there has been no mistake in resetting the shot clock, there shall be no adjustment to the shot clock. In both cases, play shall be resumed at the point of interruption. (Rule 11-2.1.c.2 and 5-12.4) |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does your association videotape games? | JS 20 | Basketball | 13 | Tue Sep 15, 2009 09:42am |