![]() |
|
|||
I will say this, the NF has certainly already screwed this up on many levels. They clearly have tried to be cute with their language.
I guess I do not get why people are still that confused. I attended a HS camp on Saturday and had someone suggest, "We have called it like this already." We did is what I am thinking. What did we call before that this rule addressed? But again the rule change already is just an exception to what would be a violation. And it uses basically the same (but not exactly the same) language as the NCAA rule change. But in the NF infinite wisdom they just could not take on the exact language, but almost identical language. I do not see how that addresses and interpretation at all when they could change an interpretation to match whatever they like since they pulled that one out of their ass before. The video posted in this situation is more in line with 9-9-2 than 9-9-1, but still would not be considered a violation based on the rule. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interference exception | CecilOne | Softball | 1 | Mon May 28, 2012 04:38pm |
Exception to 3-3-1-a? | sj | Basketball | 12 | Mon Jan 31, 2011 03:15pm |
Number Exception | PocketSidewalk | Football | 8 | Fri Aug 06, 2010 09:15pm |
8-2-D and Exception | rwest | Softball | 1 | Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:35am |
Rule 4-2-2 exception. | Mike Simonds | Football | 3 | Mon Sep 23, 2002 09:58pm |