Blarge Last Night

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by youngump

Your second paragraph seems at odds with your first. I lurk here but always find the blarge arguments interesting and read them with popcorn. But in all that, I don't ever remember saying that the fact that one official had a preliminary signal meant the other couldn't give his preliminary. (Just that he shouldn't, because I think universal consensus is that for GM purposes you're never going to intentionally cause a blarge even if you're sure your call was the right one).

Once the "other" official gives a conflicting preliminary, you're stuck with a blarge.

[sdoebler]

I think that we are all saying the same thing...

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Once the "other" official gives a conflicting preliminary, you're stuck with a blarge.

One of our posters will be along shortly to dispute this.