The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 02, 2017, 01:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed View Post
Camron is trying to say that “drawing attention to yourself” is not listed in the rule book as a technical foul. Which is pedantic and unnecessary.
It...kinda is IMO. See NFHS case 10.4.4 Sit A Comment: A player who strikes either the backboard so forcefully it cannot be ignored because it is an attempt to draw attention to the player, or a means of venting frustration may be assessed a technical foul pursuant to Rule 10-4-3.

If doing one act that can't be ignored b/c it is an attempt to draw attention results in a technical, then why can't another?
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NBA- Magic vs Wizards (Video) mutantducky Basketball 26 Wed Nov 04, 2015 09:05am
Philadelphia 76ers v. Boston Celtics: KG Illegal Screen APG Basketball 30 Wed May 16, 2012 11:18am
Chicago Bulls v. Philadelphia 76ers: Jump Ball/Filling In APG Basketball 5 Mon May 07, 2012 12:51pm
bulls/wizards backcourt violation PackersFTW Basketball 26 Fri Mar 27, 2009 03:13pm
Correctable error - Cavs vs. Wizards game 6 Dribble Basketball 3 Sat May 06, 2006 08:46am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1