Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky
It...kinda is IMO. See NFHS case 10.4.4 Sit A Comment: A player who strikes either the backboard so forcefully it cannot be ignored because it is an attempt to draw attention to the player, or a means of venting frustration may be assessed a technical foul pursuant to Rule 10-4-3.
If doing one act that can't be ignored b/c it is an attempt to draw attention results in a technical, then why can't another?
|
You make a good point. I think a lot of the times, the ball slam is a T, but, for me, it isn't automatic.