Resumption Of Play Procedure .,..

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by BryanV21

Maybe because you can give the benefit of the doubt to a team not knowing the timeout had ended. But if they're on the court (there was no TO), then there's no reason for them to delay.

Wouldn't the same be true in the throw-in situation? So, why are throw-ins and FTs treated differently?

[BryanV21]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Wouldn't the same be true in the throw-in situation? So, why are throw-ins and FTs treated differently?

Yeah. *shrugs*

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

So, why are throw-ins and FTs treated differently?

Not sure. Anybody can make a throwin; with rare exceptions, only one can attempt a free throw. But isn't that logic "backwards"?