Please clear this up.

[Jqb12]

NFHS case book, page 26. 4.14.1 Situation D
This exact scenario has an entirely different ruling than the older case book.
A1 is fouled by B1 while team A is in dbl bonus. In frustration, A1 pushes B1 after the ball becomes dead. A1 is assesses a tech foul. A1 makes both free throws for the personal foul on B1. B3 is ready to attempt the FT for the tech foul by A1. The official scorer notifies the official that the tech foul on A1 was his/hers fifth.
How do you rule?
Thanks, Jeff

[bob jenkins]

I'd rule that A1 isn't DQ'd until the officials are notified (and then notify the coach), so those FTs count.

But, if they've changed the ruling, ...

[JRutledge]

Well if the officials have been told that A1 is disqualified, then they are removed and the sub is the only person that can shoot the FT.

This is not a correctable error and the points stand if A1 is still shooting the FTs and the officials were never informed of his/her disqualification or they improperly not removed from the game.

BTW Bob, the ruling is the same as it has always been. Nothing has changed in the casebook or the NF Ruling.

Peace

[Jqb12]

Casebook from 2014-15 (page 29)has a different ruling than the 17-18 book (page 26). The 2014-15 book is ruling it a correctable error. The wrong player shooting the FT's. Cancel the shots and put the replacement in the game to shoot the throws. A bit confusing?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Jqb12

Casebook from 2014-15 (page 29)has a different ruling than the 17-18 book (page 26). The 2014-15 book is ruling it a correctable error. The wrong player shooting the FT's. Cancel the shots and put the replacement in the game to shoot the throws. A bit confusing?

I am not sure what that rulebook says, but the current ones have this as not a correctable error. And I believe if it was that way, it was a correction. Again, I do not remember it ever being different in the end.

But that is the old rulebook, so who cares. Last year I know that was the same case play that stated what we just said.

Peace

[Jqb12]

OK, so the reasoning behind this is........it’s not considered an “error” because there is no way an official would’ve known that the foul was the kids 5th. Am I thinking this through correctly?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Jqb12

NFHS case book, page 26. 4.14.1 Situation D
This exact scenario has an entirely different ruling than the older case book.
A1 is fouled by B1 while team A is in dbl bonus. In frustration, A1 pushes B1 after the ball becomes dead. A1 is assesses a tech foul. A1 makes both free throws for the personal foul on B1. B3 is ready to attempt the FT for the tech foul by A1. The official scorer notifies the official that the tech foul on A1 was his/hers fifth.
How do you rule?
Thanks, Jeff

I don't think the case play has ever been different than that.