The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 11:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
Please clear this up.

NFHS case book, page 26. 4.14.1 Situation D
This exact scenario has an entirely different ruling than the older case book.
A1 is fouled by B1 while team A is in dbl bonus. In frustration, A1 pushes B1 after the ball becomes dead. A1 is assesses a tech foul. A1 makes both free throws for the personal foul on B1. B3 is ready to attempt the FT for the tech foul by A1. The official scorer notifies the official that the tech foul on A1 was his/hers fifth.
How do you rule?
Thanks, Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 11:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
I'd rule that A1 isn't DQ'd until the officials are notified (and then notify the coach), so those FTs count.

But, if they've changed the ruling, ...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 11:58am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Well if the officials have been told that A1 is disqualified, then they are removed and the sub is the only person that can shoot the FT.

This is not a correctable error and the points stand if A1 is still shooting the FTs and the officials were never informed of his/her disqualification or they improperly not removed from the game.

BTW Bob, the ruling is the same as it has always been. Nothing has changed in the casebook or the NF Ruling.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 01:37pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jqb12 View Post
NFHS case book, page 26. 4.14.1 Situation D
This exact scenario has an entirely different ruling than the older case book.
A1 is fouled by B1 while team A is in dbl bonus. In frustration, A1 pushes B1 after the ball becomes dead. A1 is assesses a tech foul. A1 makes both free throws for the personal foul on B1. B3 is ready to attempt the FT for the tech foul by A1. The official scorer notifies the official that the tech foul on A1 was his/hers fifth.
How do you rule?
Thanks, Jeff
I don't think the case play has ever been different than that.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 01:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
Casebook from 2014-15 (page 29)has a different ruling than the 17-18 book (page 26). The 2014-15 book is ruling it a correctable error. The wrong player shooting the FT's. Cancel the shots and put the replacement in the game to shoot the throws. A bit confusing?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 01:44pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jqb12 View Post
Casebook from 2014-15 (page 29)has a different ruling than the 17-18 book (page 26). The 2014-15 book is ruling it a correctable error. The wrong player shooting the FT's. Cancel the shots and put the replacement in the game to shoot the throws. A bit confusing?
I am not sure what that rulebook says, but the current ones have this as not a correctable error. And I believe if it was that way, it was a correction. Again, I do not remember it ever being different in the end.

But that is the old rulebook, so who cares. Last year I know that was the same case play that stated what we just said.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 02:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
OK, so the reasoning behind this is........it’s not considered an “error” because there is no way an official would’ve known that the foul was the kids 5th. Am I thinking this through correctly?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 02:05pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jqb12 View Post
OK, so the reasoning behind this is........it’s not considered an “error” because there is no way an official would’ve known that the foul was the kids 5th. Am I thinking this through correctly?
It does not fit the situations in 2-10. It is that simple.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 02:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jqb12 View Post
OK, so the reasoning behind this is........it’s not considered an “error” because there is no way an official would’ve known that the foul was the kids 5th. Am I thinking this through correctly?
What Rut said, plus a player isn't DQ's until we are notified. A player can technically accumulate more than 5 personal fouls and remain in the game.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 02:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 55
“It just doesn’t fit 2-10” is a bit vague. It says “Permitting the wrong player to attempt a free throw”. Isn’t that exactly what’ going on?
But I’m getting it........the DQ player explanation does help.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 02:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jqb12 View Post
“It just doesn’t fit 2-10” is a bit vague. It says “Permitting the wrong player to attempt a free throw”. Isn’t that exactly what’ going on?
But I’m getting it........the DQ player explanation does help.
Not quite. The wrong player would be...#42 has 2 FT's coming, however #3 shoots them. #42 is the one entitled and must shoot the FT's. So leave the DQ'd part out for now.

This is a wrong player shooting the FT's.

In the case of a DQ - ONLY the DQ'd player's substitute can shoot the FT's. However a player isn't DQ'd until notified and until notified that player is just like any of the other players on the court, subject to the same rules.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 03:04pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jqb12 View Post
“It just doesn’t fit 2-10” is a bit vague. It says “Permitting the wrong player to attempt a free throw”. Isn’t that exactly what’ going on?
But I’m getting it........the DQ player explanation does help.
No, because it was determined some time ago that this is not fit the CR rule. He/she is not the wrong player, they are still a player until they are informed that they have been disqualified. The same would happen if a player with 5 fouls is discovered to actually have 5 fouls a minute later of play. You do not take off their points, they are still a legal player until they are told they are disqualified. Rule 2-14-2 clearly says that a player is officially disqualified and becomes bench personnel when the coach is notified. Well, if they are never notified, they are still a player.

It is more than one rule at play here.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 03:05pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Wow, the original poster is correct about the old ruling. I just looked it up. It says it's a correctable error. You wipe out A1's FTs, bring in A6 to re-shoot them, and allow any B team member to attempt the technical FTs.

WOW! How did that sneak by everybody???
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 03:07pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
Wow, the original poster is correct about the old ruling. I just looked it up. It says it's a correctable error. You wipe out A1's FTs, bring in A6 to re-shoot them, and allow any B team member to attempt the technical FTs.

WOW! How did that sneak by everybody???
Was it corrected at the time as a mistake?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 16, 2017, 03:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
From the interps sticky on this page:

Page 29, 4.14.1D SITUATION, RULING Correction: Officials notify the Team A coach of the disqualification and allow a substitute for A1. The points made by A1 will stand. B3 is allowed to shoot the free throws for the technical foul and Team B is given the ball at half court to continue the game. (4-14-2; 2-11-5 Note)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
...and the benches clear 7in60 Softball 18 Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:27pm
Clear Sidelines BigGref Football 15 Fri Aug 01, 2008 04:50pm
Please Help Me Clear These Up BigMurr Baseball 16 Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:06pm
Clear one's mind DownTownTonyBrown Basketball 25 Sun Jan 16, 2005 07:27pm
How clear is clear? Back In The Saddle Basketball 11 Sat Jan 11, 2003 08:47pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1