NCAA Men's National Championship Video Requests

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by ReffingAce

So as officials, the key to all the video being shown with the scrutiny of how "bad" they called the game isn't always going to be judgement calls where, was it a foul or not a foul? Was he in or out? Yes, the video will show it and it will be "obvious" at that point. But in real time, we all know this is a difficult job to process all that is happening i.e. the hand touching the out-of-bounds on the tie up. Watch that play in real time and you'll see how quickly his hand hit and was pulled back.

The key with the video is the positioning and many great officials understand this. To get calls correct, you need to be in the proper positioning. Eades may not have seen the hand because he was too close to the play as it was right at his feet. Backing out with a wider angle may have allowed him to see the hand touch.

The first foul of the game from the Slot, did he even have an angle to see the play? Was he reaching out of his primary. What was the vantage point from T? Where was each official looking on that play at that time?

We know every call and non call will be looked at because of the tape these days, but it's how you use the tape to your advantage to get better and not worry about how it will be microscoped and used against you.

Conversations about positioning die on the vine pretty quickly....LOL

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

About 50 seconds left.
Call on the floor was a held ball.
Was Meeks OOB?

Peace

[JRutledge]

I have the video in place, I am going to wait little before I post it. I think this play will be tagged by YouTube and want to see if I can do it later in the week.

Peace

The announcers needed to STFU about the officiating. Both teams were being very physical and never adjusted IMO. Raftery needs to retire the "nickel-dimer" phrase as well, doesn't help anything.

The floor on the Gonzaga end seemed to be consistently slippery, not sure what's up with that.

[Kansas Ref]

802 in 2nd half...in a tussle for a deflected pass, Berry contacts arm of Karnov, foul whistled, then on follow thru motion Karnov contacts neck of Berry--vid review leads to F1----was it defensible to interpret it as 'dead ball' foul ?

[Kansas Ref]

623 2nd half...was it really necessary to have vid review on the last second shot clock made basket by carolina?

Originally Posted by Kansas Ref

623 2nd half...was it really necessary to have vid review on the last second shot clock made basket by carolina?

Yes.

NCAA Rule 11-2.1.b.4

"Determine if the ball was released on a try for goal before the
sounding of the shot clock horn when the try is successful. The
officials must recognize the potential mistake and signal to the
scorer that an instant replay review is required prior to the ball
next becoming live. When the try is unsuccessful, a review is not
permissible."

Once the ball becomes next becomes live (when Gonzaga has possession of ball OOB for throw-in) they can no longer review. If you are asking whether they should have reviewed it....well it was pretty close.

[SD Referee]

Originally Posted by Kansas Ref

623 2nd half...was it really necessary to have vid review on the last second shot clock made basket by carolina?

No it wasn't. It was clearly out of his hand. Just another way the crew slowed down the game and broke any flow the game was getting.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Kansas Ref

623 2nd half...was it really necessary to have vid review on the last second shot clock made basket by carolina?

Peace

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

10:13 left
Is Meeks correct that Tillie traveled after the defensive rebound?

Peace

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

10:13 left
Is Meeks correct that Tillie traveled after the defensive rebound?

He got ball. Jumped off floor, then started dribble. Violation.