NCAA Men's National Championship Video Requests

[JRutledge]

It will be easier to follow if you keep all the NC game plays on this thread.

Do not just pick the obvious plays either. I am sure we all will be watching.

Peace

[Nevadaref]

3:52 of the first half.
Foul called against Collins of Gonzaga by Verne Harris from the Lead position.

[Nevadaref]

About 18:30 left in the first half.
UNC saves the ball twice on the defensive end line.

[ODog]

2:03 first half. UNC's Berry fouled attempting a 3.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by ODog

2:03 first half. UNC's Berry fouled attempting a 3.

Comment: there were four fouls against 3pt shooters in the first half.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by ODog

2:03 first half. UNC's Berry fouled attempting a 3.

Peace

[thedewed]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Peace

one clue for officials on this is if the shooter goes down in a direction not consistent with the direction that the contact came from, then consider the possibility it was a flop. good grief. there was another one from the left wing same half for UNC that was same situation, very minor contact that shouldn't have been called. I'm glad some NBA guys and media are calling out the tightness of the calls during this game. I think Collins from Gonzaga in particular got a raw deal. May help an adjustment to a little looser whistle to looking for advantage as more of a factor.

[crosscountry55]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

About 18:30 left in the first half.

UNC saves the ball twice on the defensive end line.

That was cool. In slow mo I think the NC player on the first save may have had a foot touch OOB just before he flicked the ball, but I was ok with the no call in real time.

Heck of a patient whistle. I'm not sure I could have held off. That's why they're on the floor and I'm in my living room.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Nevadaref]

17:58 remaining in the 2nd half.
Karnowski with the ball near the basket.
No whistle on the play until the ball went OOB. Seemed that it should have been either a defensive foul or a travel.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

17:58 remaining in the 2nd half.
Karnowski with the ball near the basket.
No whistle on the play until the ball went OOB. Seemed that it should have been either a defensive foul or a travel.

Peace

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

About 18:30 left in the first half.
UNC saves the ball twice on the defensive end line.

Peace

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

3:52 of the first half.
Foul called against Collins of Gonzaga by Verne Harris from the Lead position.

I know we all look alike to many, but Verne Harris is the lighter skinned brotha. IJS



Peace

[dahoopref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I know we all look alike to many, but Verne Harris is the lighter skinned brotha. IJS

Peace

Gotta admit, snorted my iced coffee, Thanks for the laugh.

[MOofficial]

So between the real job and ample amounts of reading, I'm still not seeing much as far as correct/incorrect ruling on the personal foul followed by the F1.

While I was watching the game, that ruling just didn't seem right. Can someone help me out?

We all know what they called and how it was administered.

My questions - After the personal foul, the ball becomes dead, at that moment, any contact that is illegal and excessive would have to become a dead ball contact technical foul. Is that correct or incorrect? If administered as a personal foul and then a dead ball contact, they would shoot the personal foul first (if in bonus), then the dead ball contact, with the ball being awarded at the division line for a throw in?

Sorry if it has already been discussed in this thread, I just haven't found it yet.

Thanks guys, it's been a pleasure this year!

[dahoopref]

Originally Posted by MOofficial

So between the real job and ample amounts of reading, I'm still not seeing much as far as correct/incorrect ruling on the personal foul followed by the F1.

While I was watching the game, that ruling just didn't seem right. Can someone help me out?

We all know what they called and how it was administered.

My questions - After the personal foul, the ball becomes dead, at that moment, any contact that is illegal and excessive would have to become a dead ball contact technical foul. Is that correct or incorrect? If administered as a personal foul and then a dead ball contact, they would shoot the personal foul first (if in bonus), then the dead ball contact, with the ball being awarded at the division line for a throw in?

Sorry if it has already been discussed in this thread, I just haven't found it yet.

Thanks guys, it's been a pleasure this year!

From what I saw, it was ruled a double-foul that involved a F1 on Gonzaga #24 and common foul UNC #2. From there, the procedure is as follows:

The penalty for double fouls is no free throws and play
is resumed at the point of interruption unless one of the fouls is
a flagrant foul. Gonzaga #24 will shoot a one-and-one free throw with no
players in the marked lane spaces for the common foul charged to
UNC #2. Following these free throws, UNC #2 will shoot two free throws with
no players in the marked lane spaces for the flagrant 1 personal foul
charged to Gonzaga #24. Play is resumed with a throw-in to UNC at the point
of interruption, which is nearest to where the fouls occurred.