Block/Charge Do you think C should have had this?

[Rich]

Originally Posted by BionicBanana

Thanks for the input. Definitely PC foul. L and C both out of position, that said, originated in C's primary, collision is all but outside the paint. I see it as C's whistle.

Did our opinions help shape or confirm yours?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Rich

Did our opinions help shape or confirm yours?

He still sees it as the C's whistle though. That's a problem. The message on the new way to handle secondary defenders during drives to the basket isn't getting communicated. This is a training issue. I wonder what state he is in.

[BionicBanana]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

He still sees it as the C's whistle though. That's a problem. The message on the new way to handle secondary defenders during drives to the basket isn't getting communicated. This is a training issue. I wonder what state he is in.

I appreciate the insight and feedback Nevada.
I am the L, just stumbled across the video on youtube, game from last year. I was in no position to make the call, hence terrible miss. I definitely was expecting a whistle from C. Its in IL same as:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Since the offense "beat" the primary defender so far outside and so far before the contact, C could have had a look / call on this.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I do not know why the C did not have a call on this. And I do not think this is the L's call all the way. Yes they can have a call here, but this to me is the C's call. And other than philosophy of who has this call, the C should have a play that originated in his or her area. Peace

[ballgame99]

Did something happen to video? All I see is a white box. Videos in other threads work for me.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by BionicBanana

I appreciate the insight and feedback Nevada.
I am the L, just stumbled across the video on youtube, game from last year. I was in no position to make the call, hence terrible miss. I definitely was expecting a whistle from C. Its in IL same as:

First, it takes guts and courage to post video of yourself. You obviously desire to improve. If you are willing to take the information provided by several of the posters here, even though it could be harsh, you will get better.

There is naturally some sifting of information which must be done on a public forum such as this and you will get conflicting advice. You will need to select what is best for you and the area in which you work.

I happen to agree with Rich, BNR, and Multiple Sports (who posted in your other thread on this). We believe quite strongly in the new method of having the Lead make the decisions on secondary defenders (help-defenders). I've seen numerous video clips to prove why it is better. On the other hand, Rut and Bob Jenkins have proven themselves to be quality officials over the years too and present a different take.

I will tell you that I am the instructor for over 300 HS officials in CA and get most of my 3-person information from NCAA officials Tony Padilla and Mike Reed. You will see both of them in the NCAA tournament this coming week.

[Rich]

I was asking cause I wasn't sure he heard a thing we said.

Frankly, I also find it harder to judge LGP on a play going away from me, but that's another unrelated thought.

[Raymond]

The Lead definitely should have pinched the paint. Have no problem with him making the call as the secondary Defender was in the paint.

The center official appears to be somebody who has more experience working 2 man than 3 man based on his positioning and failure to move.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

[Rich]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

The Lead definitely should have pinched the paint. Have no problem with him making the call as the secondary Defender was in the paint.

The center official appears to be somebody who has more experience working 2 man than 3 man based on his positioning and failure to move.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Thank you.

I said this about pinching the paint in post 4 and wondered if anyone else would come in and say the same thing.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Rich

Thank you.

I said this about pinching the paint in post 4 and wondered if anyone else would come in and say the same thing.

You mean like someone wrote in post #2?

[bucky]

IMO, all three officials are in horrible position before the ball is passed and they all stand without moving a bit. Meanwhile, the ball and players are certainly moving. T has to get to 28ft, C has to be a FT line extended, and L must be in a closing position. This is important for all levels let alone the level being played in the video where you are not going to get much action outside the 3pt line. Need to be closer for credibility, especially on the play in the video. From their respective positions, I think C should have made the PC call. Yes, L gets dibs so-to-speak, however he is too far away. Furthermore, girl was beat immediately (jenkins mentioned), so much that the secondary defender should have been the person that C was watching. The primary defender was not involved. The big issue is the "concrete" Freddy mentioned. That "sets" it for a poorly officiated play with no credibility.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

You mean like someone wrote in post #2?

You wrote close-down position.

I wrote pinch the paint, which is another few steps into the lane, to the O in CARBONDALE on the court.

But, yeah, wide-angle shows a lack of 3-person experience, IMO. Mirroring the ball would've had the L in the closedown position this entire video clip.