The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 11:27am
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
0 and 00

Clemson just given administrative T for having 0 in the book but player wearing 00.

Announcer stated that a team can have both 0 and 00 playing but 0 must be 0 in the book and 00 must be 00.

Interesting that NFHS does not allow that: "A team member list shall not have both numbers 0 and 00." (3-4-3d)

Is NCAA-M different? Or was the announcer wrong?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 12:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
From the NCAAM rules book:

2�
The following numbers are legal: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 00, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 40,
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, and 55� Team rosters can
include 0 or 00, but not both�
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
Clemson just given administrative T for having 0 in the book but player wearing 00.

Announcer stated that a team can have both 0 and 00 playing but 0 must be 0 in the book and 00 must be 00.

Interesting that NFHS does not allow that: "A team member list shall not have both numbers 0 and 00." (3-4-3d)

Is NCAA-M different? Or was the announcer wrong?
The announcer is incorrect. The rule is the same as for NFHS.

I gave this exact same technical foul about seven years ago. Kid was wearing 00, but was listed as 0. Those are different numbers/symbols used to identify players, just as 33 is not the same as 3.

Last edited by Nevadaref; Thu Nov 17, 2016 at 04:05pm.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 02:10pm
Official Fiveum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Eurasia - no, Myasia
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
...Or was the announcer wrong?
Why did you put this statement in the form of a question? This isn't Jeopardy.
__________________
I don't know what "signature" means.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 02:56pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,770
I'd chalk it up as a transcription error.

Since 0 and 00 can't play at the same time, where's the confusion?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 03:23pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
I'd chalk it up as a transcription error.

Since 0 and 00 can't play at the same time, where's the confusion?
I think I'll start verifying it's correct whenever I see 0 or 00 in the book and save the headache.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 04:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
I think I'll start verifying it's correct whenever I see 0 or 00 in the book and save the headache.
It doesn't matter what's in the book, only what is on the roster that the team submitted to the official scorer.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 04:08pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
It doesn't matter what's in the book, only what is on the roster that the team submitted to the official scorer.
Doesn't preclude me from verifying it's correctly input so I don't have to deal with it later. I prefer dealing with any book issues before the game, not during the game.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 05:59pm
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 965
So is it an administrative tech or a direct to the coach for an illegal uniform? What if both numbers are present can the coach avoid the tech by not playing one of them?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2016, 10:53pm
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharpshooternes View Post
So is it an administrative tech or a direct to the coach for an illegal uniform? What if both numbers are present can the coach avoid the tech by not playing one of them?
The relevant rule then is 10-6-4: "The head coach shall not permit a tam member to participate while wearing an illegal uniform (see 3-4)".

Does that answer the above question? Or is there some other casebook or interpretation that steers us in a different direction?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 18, 2016, 07:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
The relevant rule then is 10-6-4: "The head coach shall not permit a tam member to participate while wearing an illegal uniform (see 3-4)".

Does that answer the above question? Or is there some other casebook or interpretation that steers us in a different direction?
What part of the uniform was illegal? 0 is a legal number. Your cite would be relevant if the player was wearing 88, for example.

The relevant cite is "changing a number in the scorebook to match what the player is wearing." (or whatever the specific wording is)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 18, 2016, 08:50am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
What part of the uniform was illegal? 0 is a legal number. Your cite would be relevant if the player was wearing 88, for example.

The relevant cite is "changing a number in the scorebook to match what the player is wearing." (or whatever the specific wording is)
Would we consider one of the jerseys illegal if there were players wearing 0 & 00?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 18, 2016, 09:41am
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
What part of the uniform was illegal? 0 is a legal number. Your cite would be relevant if the player was wearing 88, for example.
Thanx Bob!
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 18, 2016, 09:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Would we consider one of the jerseys illegal if there were players wearing 0 & 00?
The rule says the team member LIST shall not contain 0 and 00. So i would say we are removing the number from the list in the book and go administrative as opposed to a direct T for illegal uniform. have to think more about it.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 18, 2016, 09:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: White, GA
Posts: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
I'd chalk it up as a transcription error.

Since 0 and 00 can't play at the same time, where's the confusion?
I know this has been discussed on here before and it all came back to a NFHS interpretation that is posted on this website from the year 2008. It seems to indicate that they could play at the same time and the penalty would be for illegal uniform. At least, in NFHS.
__________________
Mulk

Last edited by ronny mulkey; Fri Nov 18, 2016 at 09:55am. Reason: clarify NFHS games
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1