Fashion Fun

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Dad

... a rule that had zero impact on the game.

If indeed, the rule has zero impact on the game, and one has a choice of doing it the right way, or the wrong way, why not chose the right way? One is just as easy as the other. But only one way it right.

[Dad]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

If indeed, the rule has zero impact on the game, and one has a choice of doing it the right way, or the wrong way, why not chose the right way? One is just as easy as the other. But only one way it right.

I agree with everything you just said. Why are you out go get me, lol.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Dad

I agree with everything you just said. Why are you out go get me ...

You're fairly new around here, and I'm having trouble understanding some of your posts. Sorry.

Originally Posted by Dad

Oh no, an official forgot a rule that had zero impact on the game. Oh, what a foul world we live in. Oh, woe is us, having to deal with such horrible officials.

[Dad]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

You're fairly new around here, and I'm having trouble understanding some of your posts. Sorry.

Gotcha, yeah, I was trying to be as sarcastic as possible. I just don't think it's that big of a deal if an officials only fault is forgetting about an undershirt not being the correct color. I enforce the rules and expect other officials to do the same, but if an assigner assigns someone who won't enforce it then it's out of my hands. If I'm on the game it'll get fixed. If I'm not on the game; I'm not going to let an undershirt ruin my enjoyment of the game.

[grunewar]

Originally Posted by Dad

Gotcha, yeah, I was trying to be as sarcastic as possible.

Sarcasm should always be noted in BLUE, seriously.

[Dad]

Originally Posted by grunewar

Sarcasm should always be noted in BLUE, seriously.

Noted.

[grunewar]

Originally Posted by Dad

Noted.

It's just a little forum humor!

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by grunewar

Sarcasm should always be noted in BLUE, seriously.

Originally Posted by Dad

Noted.

Somebody seriously brought this up a few years ago, but it never officially took.

Note that grunewar's post was in blue.

Get it?

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by grunewar

Sarcasm should always be noted in BLUE, seriously.

Glad to see this has finally gained some traction!

[BDevil15]

Just for fun. Had another away game tonight and I asked about what was legal and what wasn't. Official said that All undershirts could be black as long as all players had black undershirts, along with the black tights. Or he said they could be same color as jerseys(green) with black tights, as long as all players were the same...

So now I have 4 different answers.

[SAJ]

Originally Posted by Dad

Gotcha, yeah, I was trying to be as sarcastic as possible. I just don't think it's that big of a deal if an officials only fault is forgetting about an undershirt not being the correct color. I enforce the rules and expect other officials to do the same, but if an assigner assigns someone who won't enforce it then it's out of my hands. If I'm on the game it'll get fixed. If I'm not on the game; I'm not going to let an undershirt ruin my enjoyment of the game.

My thinking is when I happen to attend a game, or see game film, of officials that allow this type of thing is what else they might be letting go by either not applying a rule or not knowing it.

[Dad]

Originally Posted by SAJ

My thinking is when I happen to attend a game, or see game film, of officials that allow this type of thing is what else they might be letting go by either not applying a rule or not knowing it.

Paranoia.

[Freddy]

"Impact on the Game" rules . . . so-called "No Impact on the Game" rules.
Good officials can know and reasonably apply both.
Lesser officials, alas, are able to choose only one of the two. If that.