|
|||
POE - FT Shooter Contact
Have my first contest of the year tonight...Would like input on this from you guys on this.
NFHS Reads: Players who occupy free throw lane line marked spaces during free throws may enter the free-throw lane upon the free thrower releasing the ball; however, should a defensive player cross the free-throw line too soon, it is a violation. A delayed violation signal is to be displayed. If the free throw is successful, the violation is ignored. If a defender contacts the free thrower, a personal foul is the correct ruling. If the free throw is unsuccessful, the violation is enforced and a substitute free throw is awarded. If a defender contacts the free thrower, a personal foul is the correct ruling. Whether the free throw is or is not successful, the penalty for the personal foul is awarded. If the free thrower’s team is in a bonus situation, the free thrower would be awarded a one-and one or two free throws. If the free thrower’s team is not in a bonus situation, his or her team would be awarded a throw-in along the end line. So is any contact on a FT shooter by defense, while ball is in flight is to be called a PF... Is it that black and white for us officials? |
|
|||
I think we have found our replacement for the "if the B2 deflects the ball and A1 catches it in the back court before it touches the floor" question.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
A blatant block out, rear in the gut prior to contact, sure...a slight bump setting up to box out...perhaps or might we have a delayed violation here.... Just trying to see what people have to say about it and how they would officiat it. Don't let post count fool you...I just haven't been on here in a few years. Couldn't remember my old password and I changed email accounts... |
|
|||
Check with your state or local association. Some states are mandating what you quoted from the nfhs: "any contact must be ruled a personal foul" and others are expecting that contact be more than incidental to be considered a foul. I have not heard what Indiana expects.
BTW...your first game is today and you are JUST NOW looking into this???
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call Last edited by Freddy; Thu Nov 19, 2015 at 10:26am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
So is any contact on a FT shooter by defense, while ball is in flight is to be called a PF... Is it that black and white for us officials?[/QUOTE]
Before it touches the rim: Violation and PF, unless its somehow is an intentional foul. My understanding is that the contact does not negate the violation. |
|
|||
Quote:
Have always appreciated the info I gather from this site in the past. |
|
|||
Quote:
And, I don't think anyone has ever said "if the State says "Y" when the NFHS says "X", do 'X'" Honestly, these posts almost make me long for the "in my little corner we wear belts" posts. |
|
|||
Quote:
Hey Arem, can you help this fellow Indiana official with what your state says on this issue?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
|||
Our association has instructed us to go with a violation unless the contact is severe enough that we would normally call a foul. IOW, NOT ALL contact is a foul. The stupid thing about this stupid ruling is that you could have a FT with lanes cleared and then adjudicated additional FT's with players on the lane.
I didn't know boxing out the FT shooter was such a rampant issue that the NFHS had to overly complicate this.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Quote:
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
"Protection of the free thrower..." Its the new world we live in.
|
|
|||
Hahah....I guess I could make an argument that it negates advantage of the defense getting body into shooter during flight since shooter can't go until contact. But yeah, I didn't know it was that much of a problem either... |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jab by the defender on the jump shooter (non-contact) | FrankHtown | Basketball | 44 | Thu Apr 02, 2009 06:31am |
When is hair contact a contact? | OmniSpiker | Volleyball | 6 | Tue Nov 04, 2008 06:27pm |
Contact with FT shooter | texaspaul | Basketball | 9 | Tue Dec 04, 2007 01:17pm |
Contact with shooter after release | womens_hoops | Basketball | 9 | Mon Jan 10, 2005 02:28pm |