|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Is not the POI, the moment in play, at which the error is discovered/acknowledged, rather than the error itself? Therefore, in the case of a merited free throw that was not awarded, but now must be awarded, the POI is subsequent to that action, and requires/allows that the free throw be shot w/o players along the lane, and the time from when the error occurred to the moment the error was discovered, is not to be restored. Thus, play will resume at the POI, which is the awarded throw-in.
This seems to be the thought process of the Rules/Case play author(s).
__________________
To be good at a sport, one must be smart enough to play the game -- and dumb enough to think that it's important . . . |
|
|||
I'm a little foggy on this, but I don't think POI comes into play on CEs. There is "the spot where play was stopped to correct the error" (or some such words), but that's not necessarily POI (as defined). Maybe I'm just too tired.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Bob, do you know how long that first case play has been in the case book? thx Last edited by BigCat; Wed Nov 11, 2015 at 10:57am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Before that the choice of words was not referring to the definition of POI, but merely normal English language. 2004-05 wording: ". . . If an error is corrected, play shall be resumed from the point at which it was interrupted to rectify the error, unless it involves awarding a merited free throw(s) and there has been no change of team possession since the error was made, in which case play shall resume as after any free-throw attempt(s)." 2007-08 wording: ". . . If an error is corrected, play shall be resumed from the point of interruption to rectify the error, unless it involves awarding a merited free throw(s) and there has been no change of team possession since the error was made, in which case play shall resume as after any free-throw attempt(s)." |
|
|||
I'm giving myself a headache. Let me ask anybody this…
The correctable error rule says we go to the POI unless it involves awarding a merited FT and there has been no change of team possession since the error. if no change of team possession then resume it like any other FT attempt. The case play 2.10.1A, we all know, says team B securing the rebound and passing to a teammate constitutes no change in team possession. You go back and shoot the free throw with lane spaces occupied. Let's say the play goes further and team A fouls team B after the teammate catches the pass. lets say team B is in the bonus. so in this example the ball is not going to go to team A. (they are not entitled to throw in or FT). The ball is going to stay with team B. Has there been a "change of team possession." If there hasn't, I'm not supposed to go to the POI? But if i don't i can't deal with the foul by A? I know what I would do…I would have A shoot their extra FT with lane spaces cleared and then line all players up for B 1 and 1 and play on. If the case play is correct about not being a change in possession how do i get to my result. (which is going to POI in the end) maybe I'm having a complete and total brain cramp... |
|
|||
Quote:
I hate to admit it, but I would do the same thing. I don't have rules justification to cancel or ignore the foul on A, so in the spirit of administering penalties in the order in which the fouls occurred, I'd feel obliged to do it this way. Makes me second guess what I'd do if B were NOT in the bonus. Would be interesting to get an official NFHS interp on this. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
i dont see any way to save it. |
|
|||
No change in possession
A1 is entitled to 2 free throws, after the first free throw the ball remains live. A4 rebounds and is fouled by B4. Team A is in the bonus.
Since there has been no change in possession. How is this administered? |
|
|||
Quote:
Of course, me, I'll say I was blowing my whistle to kill the play b/c we had another free throw to shoot.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
The next question is how do we get here under the rules, to using the POI, when the rule says we dont use it if there isnt a change of possession?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IAABO Refresher Exam Question #5 ... | BillyMac | Basketball | 5 | Fri Nov 07, 2014 08:44am |
IAABO Refresher Exam Question #33 ... | BillyMac | Basketball | 7 | Fri Nov 07, 2014 01:33am |
IAABO Refresher Exam Question #57 ... | BillyMac | Basketball | 0 | Wed Nov 05, 2014 05:48pm |
2011 IAABO Refresher Exam - Question 66 ... | BillyMac | Basketball | 4 | Wed Dec 07, 2011 07:37pm |
IAABO Refresher Exam Question 25 | ken roberts | Basketball | 6 | Wed Oct 27, 1999 08:43pm |