|
|||
Quote:
You do not have to have player control in the frontcourt to have a backcourt violation. You have to have team control. |
|
|||
Quote:
I believe the case play is wrong. I am not the first or the last person to say that. It does not fit with the rule they have in place and yes it came up only when the rule was added for TC for a throw-in for foul purposes. Also the NF came out and said they had some issues with their wording and that only the rules on TC for a throw-in were meant for foul purposes. That is why they had to make that statement after the fact. Quote:
I will do it for you. Rule 4-12-2a says: "When a player of a team is in control." What am I missing here? Oh, Rule 4-12-1 says: "A player is in control of the ball when he/she is holding, dribbling a live ball......" Touching a ball does not establishes control. You have to have touching before possession, but touching a ball does not mean you are holding or dribbling a ball. And Rule 9-9-1 says: A player shall not be the first to touch the ball after it has been in team control in the front court...... You have to have player control before you have team control. Player control is restrictive to when you can call a timeout, what type of foul is called and if you can have a closely guarded count. Team control does not require player control after team control has been established, which is why you can have a BC violation. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) Last edited by JRutledge; Thu Nov 05, 2015 at 09:50pm. |
|
|||
You already had the required player control in the backcourt, which established true TC.
4-12-3b Team control continues until an opponent secures control. The touch in the frontcourt by Team A establishes TC in the FC in the case play in question. |
|
|||
Quote:
This was a ball passed by a thrower (from a throw-in), and the play or question from Geof was off of a throw-in (Which again we are in a rules myth thread) not a pass from a person on the court. What part of having control in the FC is a myth with the BC violation rule? Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) Last edited by JRutledge; Thu Nov 05, 2015 at 10:11pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
I understand that the original question was about a throw in, but your blanket statement is only half right. You need to re-read my original post. I said that the case play didn't apply to a throw in. Last edited by OKREF; Thu Nov 05, 2015 at 10:22pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
It is like I made a comment about requirements to be a US Senator but you are talking about what it takes to be President. Well, some of the basic requirements are the exact same, but there are some differences. I was not talking (and it is obvious if you read all the comments) about a player that has established TC in-bounds (FC or BC status) and the ball being tipped around and causing a violation. We were only talking about a throw-in (very specific) and why it would not be a violation if Team A touches or taps a ball in the FC and goes and touches it in the BC. There were like 4 other people that made the very same point but used different words. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
OKREF posted a case play that contradicted a blanket statement you made, and you proceeded to state your disagreement with that case play. It really is that simple.
No hard feelings, but that is what happened. |
|
|||
Jeff was talking specifically about TC after a throw-in, which was a question brought up by Geof. TC control does not carry over from the throw-in, it must be established inbounds before there can be a BC violation. That's how I read Jeff's initial response.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Fri Nov 06, 2015 at 12:31am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Well, after a throw-in you don't have TC simply by touching the ball in the FC. This discussion was prompted by a statement about throw ins.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules | BillyMac | Basketball | 29 | Tue Jun 25, 2013 04:58pm |
The Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules | BillyMac | Basketball | 65 | Mon Dec 06, 2010 06:06pm |
The Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules | chseagle | Basketball | 14 | Sun Sep 19, 2010 06:59pm |
Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules | BillyMac | Basketball | 21 | Sun May 11, 2008 03:45pm |
Misunderstood basketball rules | Art N | Basketball | 17 | Wed Nov 14, 2001 03:40pm |