![]() |
|
|||
The problem is that 9-1 is the ONLY place in the rules for the requirement that (A) any free throw either be successful or strike the ring. It is mentioned in the Casebook in two places, but not in the rules. Add (B) "or backboard" and the rules have nowhere else that requirement (A) be met.
Solved now that the apparent correction from NFHS came out -- cf. other recent post. Haven't seen that out on the NFHS website yet. I hereby volunteer, with two other forum contributors of your choice, to serve on the new OPCBWOPTROC: "Officials' Proofreading Committee before We Officially Print the Rulebook or Casebook." Dear NFHS, I do stuff like this at work and I'm fired. You have how many on your "Rules Committee"? I see the pictures of 13 in the front of my flawed rulebook. Errors like this are quite beneath any professional organization. You can do better than this. I'm here to help. Email me. And BillyMac.
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
9-9-1 Backcourt - Editorial Revision? | Freddy | Basketball | 14 | Thu Jun 19, 2014 08:01am |
Timeout Revision | stiffler3492 | Basketball | 1 | Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:15am |
NFHS Unannounced Rule Change | BillyMac | Basketball | 1 | Mon Oct 15, 2007 09:48pm |
Figuring out the RPP revision | Nevadaref | Basketball | 10 | Fri Oct 12, 2007 06:00pm |
Revision 7-5-7 | BMA | Basketball | 9 | Thu Aug 30, 2001 10:06pm |