Those of you willing to ignore this simply because they missed it in the rules book are doing so in the face of ignoring what the NFHS clearly wants.
And it seems as though a few of you are doing this cause you think it's unnecessary or stupid to have this requirement.
I was at a meeting Monday night -- this is in the NFHS-written slide deck and was pretty prominent. They feel that because the shooter is not allow to cross over the line that no defender should be able to go into his area until the restrictions end for the shooter.
It will be fixed, but exactly *why* do you want to ignore something that the NFHS so *clearly* wants?
|