|
Wed Apr 02, 2014, 05:07am
|
|||
|
|||
|
So What Happened
Article I read this morning. I haven't read new rule 7.13, nor did I see the play in question. But from his description, why doesn't the obstruction rule come into play? And is it true that collisions are legal as long as there's no evidence of maliciousness as the article alludes?
Midweek Morosi: New rule on collisions bringing more cloudiness than clarity | FOX Sports on MSN
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Whatever happened in KY? | 26 Year Gap | Basketball | 4 | Fri Feb 11, 2011 09:09pm |
| What happened? | NCASAUmp | Softball | 13 | Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:34pm |
| well it happened, well almost happened | cmathews | Basketball | 7 | Mon Jan 29, 2007 04:17pm |
| Has this happened to you? | Gus | Basketball | 2 | Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:39pm |
| Whatever happened to "Whatever happened to class"? | UmpJM | Baseball | 7 | Sat Jul 30, 2005 03:49pm |
Threaded Mode
