![]() |
|
|||
True for the main part of the rule when it deals with a runner getting hit, but not in the Exception on the IFF, so it leaves it to interpretation.
Similarly, 7.09(k) talks of a runner getting hit by a batted ball. It mentions that the runner is not out if that happens after the ball gets by a fielder or is deflected by a fielder. But it makes no mention that the ball is dead or not. So if it is not dead when a runner gets hit by a deflected batted ball, one would believe the same is true on the IFF while on the base. After all, in both cases the runner is not called out, so there is no interference. I didn't have access to an authoritative interpretation to check.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interference exception | CecilOne | Softball | 1 | Mon May 28, 2012 04:38pm |
Exception to 3-3-1-a? | sj | Basketball | 12 | Mon Jan 31, 2011 03:15pm |
8-2-D and Exception | rwest | Softball | 1 | Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:35am |
Religion Exception | Zebra29 | Football | 10 | Thu Oct 27, 2005 07:34am |
Rule 4-2-2 exception. | Mike Simonds | Football | 3 | Mon Sep 23, 2002 09:58pm |