View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 12, 2013, 05:34pm
Dave Reed Dave Reed is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
Well, JMO, but if it was so definitive, J/R wouldn't be compelled to make that interpretation, and only cite 7.08(f) and not 5.09(f).
J/R is, and was intended to be, an re-organization of the rules of baseball. It started as the rules manual for an umpire school. It is not a collection of interpretations like e.g. the MLBUM or BRD.

So J/R are "compelled" to make the interpretation because the book intends to cover all the rules.
Reply With Quote