The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack (5) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  5 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Hybrid Pitching Stance

Well, I had my first games of the season Friday night. (DH). A little chilly for Southern standards but, it was good to be back on the field.

At the plate meeting we discussed the POE's and sure enough in the 3rd inning, with a runner on third, the pitcher stands in the hybrid position and pitches as if it is a windup. After I call the balk and again, explain to the coach, he admits that he hadn't really paid any attention to the POE's.

Oh well, good to back on the field, got 4 games scheduled this week.

PS: I did get a pitcher ask about the 3-1 move being disallowed. I told him that it is still allowed by NFHS rules but, next year when he gets to the Pro's it will probably not be allowed.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 18, 2013, 11:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North, TX
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by jicecone View Post
with a runner on third, the pitcher stands in the hybrid position and pitches as if it is a windup. After I call the balk and again, explain to the coach, he admits that he hadn't really paid any attention to the POE's.
I've balked this in years past, but never balled it with no runners on (nobody gave a flip, including me). Now they POE it and want us enforce it all the time. Maybe a lesson learned with a ball called cost less than a balk in a run called.

And a ball called (versus a balk called) probably reduces the likehood of a coach accusing us of OOO'ing it...ah, that's just crazy talk.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 11:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Seeing as how it is the coaches who have the largest voice in FED rules, I say if it's in the POE, then balk the crap out of them!

Their
rules - their problem, not mine!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900 View Post
seeing as how it is the coaches who have the largest voice in fed rules, i say if it's in the poe, then balk the crap out of them!

their
rules - their problem, not mine!
+4000
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 605
I truly see this as a reincarnation (on the high school level) of 1988's year of the balk.

They are making a mountain out of a molehill.

Here is a not-so-bold prediction: I will eject someone over this POE this year.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 04:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
This is straight forward stuff. Your either in the windup or set position depending upon the position of your feet. When in either position there are guidleines to follow, (aka Rules).

This is exactly how I explained the Balk call to the coach. Two distinct positions.

The only reason you may be ejecting someone is because they are ignorant, (which means they sholud be ejected more often) or you have to cleanup after other umpires that want to get paid but, not do their job.

Actually, if you take a closer look at this, in reality it is making your job easier. Your either in a Set or Windup position or your not.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 06:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North, TX
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawump View Post
I truly see this as a reincarnation (on the high school level) of 1988's year of the balk.

They are making a mountain out of a molehill.
But there is a difference with the HS rule set. In Fed, in the wind-up position, you can not step and throw to a base to try to pickoff a runner without disengaging first (not so in OBR). For example a LHP in the windup position can not step and throw to 3B without disengaging first. If F1 is in this hybrid stance (which is a legal set stance) can he or can he not step and throw to a base. How can you balk F1 in my example for throwing to 3B, if he is in a legal set position?

If he is in a legal set position and he starts to go into a wind-up, that is a balk. You can't have both the advantage of a set position and go into a wind-up.

Now balling this with no runners on? That's looking for trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 19, 2013, 07:23pm
Medium Kahuna
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: At home
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawump View Post
Here is a not-so-bold prediction: I will eject someone over this POE this year.
law, it doesn't have to come to that. I enforced the rule last season without any ejections.

Treat it as game management: when the starting F1 or any sub is warming up, he's usually in the windup (some relievers use only the set, and for them it won't matter). If they're in a "hybrid" stance, I speak to the head coach about it.

Early in the season, I treat it as something the state wants us to enforce; later in the season, I tell them it's going to be enforced in the tournament. Either way, they'll want to address it now.

I did this 4 or 5 times last season. Three times, the pitching coach came over, heard what I was saying, and hollered to his F1 to "get on the rubber!" I'd guess that he had instructed his F1 to do it correctly, but the kid ignored him.

So for those teams, at least, the coaches and I were on the same page.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/94079-hybrid-pitching-stance.html
Posted By For Type Date
Point of emphasis - Forums This thread Refback Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:29pm
Point of emphasis - Forums This thread Refback Wed Mar 06, 2013 08:46pm
Point of emphasis - Forums This thread Refback Wed Mar 06, 2013 06:27pm
Point of emphasis - Forums This thread Refback Wed Mar 06, 2013 05:39pm
Point of emphasis - Forums This thread Refback Wed Mar 06, 2013 05:12pm

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Davis stance/K3C DonInKansas Baseball 24 Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:57pm
Stance mike1989 Baseball 20 Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:08pm
GD Stance LLPA13UmpDan Baseball 42 Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:15pm
Gorilla Stance blueump Baseball 49 Thu Apr 14, 2005 07:56am
Tim McClelland- New Stance LeftyRef Baseball 14 Tue Apr 12, 2005 08:55am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1