The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 16, 2012, 03:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 88
Splitting the Difference

I witnessed this play and then talked to one of the coaches after the game. FED game with R2 & R3 and one out. B1 misses on a squeeze attempt and R3 is in a rundown between third and home while R2 heads to third. While attempting to return to third, R3 runs into F5 who is standing in the baseline without the ball. No call or delayed dead ball signal is made. R3 is tagged before reaching third and R2 is tagged as he begins to return to second. BU looks at PU and both look confused. After a few seconds, BU signals that both runners are out. After much discussion, B3 is placed back on third and
B2 is called out.

After the game I spoke to one of the coaches and he said that PU told him an inning later that he had to bail out his partner and "give one to each team."

Did they get this right?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 16, 2012, 04:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Gulf Coast of TX to Destin Fl
Posts: 988
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpire99 View Post
I witnessed this play and then talked to one of the coaches after the game. FED game with R2 & R3 and one out. B1 misses on a squeeze attempt and R3 is in a rundown between third and home while R2 heads to third. While attempting to return to third, R3 runs into F5 who is standing in the baseline without the ball. No call or delayed dead ball signal is made. R3 is tagged before reaching third and R2 is tagged as he begins to return to second. BU looks at PU and both look confused. After a few seconds, BU signals that both runners are out. After much discussion, B3 is placed back on third and
B2 is called out.

After the game I spoke to one of the coaches and he said that PU told him an inning later that he had to bail out his partner and "give one to each team."

Did they get this right?
No......

Joel
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 16, 2012, 04:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Quote:
FED Rule 8 Section 3 Art.2
When a runner is obstructed while advancing or returning to a base, the umpire shall award the obstructed runner and each other runner affected by the obstruction the bases they would have reached, in his opinion, had there been no obstruction. . If the runner achieves the base he was attempting to acquire, then the obstruction is ignored. The obstructed runner is awarded a minimum of of one base beyond his position when the obstruction occurred. ..... When obstruction occurs, the umpire gives the delayed dead ball signal and calls "obstruction". If an award is to be made, the ball becomes dead when time is taken to make the award.
Did they get it right ??
NO


Quote:
Originally Posted by umpire99 View Post
... he said that PU told him an inning later that he had to bail out his partner and "give one to each team."
This saddens me.

Last edited by rbmartin; Sat Jun 16, 2012 at 04:40pm. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 16, 2012, 04:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpire99 View Post
I witnessed this play and then talked to one of the coaches after the game. FED game with R2 & R3 and one out. B1 misses on a squeeze attempt and R3 is in a rundown between third and home while R2 heads to third. While attempting to return to third, R3 runs into F5 who is standing in the baseline without the ball. No call or delayed dead ball signal is made. R3 is tagged before reaching third and R2 is tagged as he begins to return to second. BU looks at PU and both look confused. After a few seconds, BU signals that both runners are out. After much discussion, B3 is placed back on third and
B2 is called out.

After the game I spoke to one of the coaches and he said that PU told him an inning later that he had to bail out his partner and "give one to each team."

Did they get this right?
This is one place where I can see an advantage to OBR on obstruction.

For OBR: That's obstruction! TIME! Award R3 home and R2 third.

But what ugliness to have to allow the play to continue.

Rita
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 16, 2012, 07:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
FED wouldn't have been much different. With R2 standing on 3B at the time of OBS, probably action would have stopped with the OBS call.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Splitting Team During Warm Up - Technical? NCHSAA Basketball 6 Fri Dec 30, 2011 09:33am
Trail..."splitting the court" RookieDude Basketball 9 Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:25am
is there a difference? timharris Basketball 11 Thu Feb 03, 2005 06:33pm
Is there a difference williebfree Basketball 2 Thu Dec 12, 2002 10:46am
What's the difference? Mark Padgett Basketball 15 Tue Jun 12, 2001 08:59am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1