The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2012, 11:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Tyler View Post
Nope, you don't force a runner that hasn't been obstructed. And I hope you mean R1.
So am I understanding you correctly that you'd have runners on 2nd and 3rd ?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2012, 11:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
FED:

If you rule a runner was obstructed between 2B and 3B you MUST award him at least 3B. If that pushes another runner to the plate so be it.

You cannot unring the bell.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2012, 11:58pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
FED:

If you rule a runner was obstructed between 2B and 3B you MUST award him at least 3B. If that pushes another runner to the plate so be it.

You cannot unring the bell.
I'd have to see that one in writing.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 01, 2012, 07:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Tyler View Post
I'd have to see that one in writing.
RIF.

FED 8-3-2, 4th sentence "If any preceding runner is forced to advance by the awarding of a base or bases to an obstructed runner, the umpire shall award this preceding runner the necessary base or bases."

Other codes have similar language.

Now, in the revised FED play where obstructed R1 reaches third, and then retreats to second, I'd let the play stand.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 01, 2012, 07:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
I do not have my book in front of me but I'm thinking that if the runner advanced to the base to which he would have been awarded due to OBS, then voluntarily retreats to a previous base, then he gets nothing from me. I think this would be my ruling in either OBR or FED.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 01, 2012, 12:26pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caesar's Ghost View Post
RIF.

FED 8-3-2, 4th sentence "If any preceding runner is forced to advance by the awarding of a base or bases to an obstructed runner, the umpire shall award this preceding runner the necessary base or bases."

Other codes have similar language.

Now, in the revised FED play where obstructed R1 reaches third, and then retreats to second, I'd let the play stand.
If you had a R2 & R1, and R1 was obstructed by F3 going back to the bag, yeah advance all runners due to the obstruction....That's as good an example as any. When both runners are running in "reverse", it kind of hard to advance runners.

Does it give a case play to any effect?

I don't have books anymore.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Protection Always Wright Baseball 65 Tue Aug 25, 2009 04:24pm
Eye Protection outathm Softball 18 Wed Jun 04, 2008 05:40am
Head Protection PFISTO Baseball 1 Wed May 02, 2007 06:46am
Obstruction, when judgment is made on protection Dakota Softball 11 Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:36pm
Snapper Protection don16954 Football 7 Mon Nov 12, 2001 01:09pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1