![]() |
|
|||
Tee, I don't feel I was overly critical.
I felt the questions (and answers) were simplistic to any veteran umpire and based upon the following:
Tee, I'm not being judgmental as I mentioned no names. I was just saying that I was surprised at some of the "misses." To edify, yes, that included some of the WHO, but it also included the total number of misses........ I'd have been no less surprised by any veteran umpire trying to explain to me an award of 1+1 or that the hands were part of the bat. IMO, this is bare basics a veteran umpire should know. Still, even veteran umpires manage an occasional brainfart. I can tell you that from experience..... Freix |
Bookmarks |
|
|