The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 09, 2011, 11:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 121
Batter's Box Question

I was watching the Braves/Marlins game tonight, and early in the game, one of the Marlins players laid down a bunt. As his bat made contact with the ball, his right foot was entirely inside the batter's box, and his left foot was partially inside the batter's box, and the back part of his left foot was between the batter's box and the catcher.

As they showed the replay, the TV commentators started saying that he should have been called out. I didn't think that was right because I thought that as long as part of the foot was inside the box, it was okay. Am I correct there, or is the TV guy right?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 09, 2011, 11:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 340
The rule says the foot has to be entirely outside the batter's box.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 09, 2011, 11:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan10 View Post
the TV commentators started saying
Red flag numbers 1, 2, and 3. For the batter to be out, his foot would have to be completely out of the box. If the batter's foot is touching any part of the line, for the purpose of the rule, he is still in the box.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 10, 2011, 01:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan10 View Post
is the TV guy right?
Unless it is Steve Palermo talking on a Fox broadcast...whenever you have to ask this question the answer is "No".
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 11, 2011, 10:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 323
Send a message via AIM to aceholleran
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawump View Post
Unless it is Steve Palermo talking on a Fox broadcast...whenever you have to ask this question the answer is "No".
Very well put.
__________________
There is no such thing as idiot-proof, only idiot-resistant.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 11, 2011, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
And just on the topic of making that call as an official...Can't we all agree that it's a very tough call to make unless something extraordinary happens? My eyes are tracking the pitch. I don't have an extra one to peak down at his feet. It would have to be clear as day with a little help from a partner. My point is, these TV announcers are constantly looking for inconsistencies and rarely stop to think about the priorities of the umpire.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 11, 2011, 11:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIZFKU View Post
It would have to be clear as day with a little help from a partner.
I would never go to my partner on a batter's box issue.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 11, 2011, 12:40pm
UES UES is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 83
Quote:
I would never go to my partner on a batter's box issue.
While I agree with you for the most part, I think MIZFKU brings up a good point about tracking the pitch. One of the reasons for getting help on check/half swings is because it is impossible to have "one eye on the pitch and the other eye on the swing". Doesn't that same line of thinking apply to a play like this... ie, you can't have one eye on the pitch location/bunt attempt and the other eye on the batter's foot out of the box?

Now, I know that a base umpire positioned 90+ feet away isn't likely to see where that foot is in relation to the semi "wiped out" lines of the batter's box but I think you can see the point we're trying to make here. Unless you're looking for something like that (ie, you know that particular batter likes to drag bunt a lot), this is an extremely difficult call for the plate umpire to make... not to mention its usually the batter's FRONT foot (the fartherst part of the batter's body away from the umpire) that tends to be outside the box on plays like this.

Don't get me wrong, as a PU, I'm probably not going to get help on a play like this because I'd probably be putting my partner in a tough position because if the call does get changed, then one of us is likely going to have an EJ from the opposing coach. BUT, as a point of discussion amongst us umpires, is it necessarily a bad thing to get input from your partner in case, by chance, he happend to actually see the foot outside the box at the point of contact? Unless of course you're that special umpire who can have one eye look one way and the other look in a different direction Just something to think about...
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 11, 2011, 01:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N.KY
Posts: 87
Batter's box question

The announcer must have been Tim McCarver. Sounds like one of his brilliant comment about a game he says he played?
__________________
UMP64

Thoes who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 11, 2011, 03:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Thanks UES. I agree with all of you. I'm never going to my partner to say "Hey, I think he stepped out of the box. What do you have?" But it was just the idea of it. That's a call I'm never making unless I have been tipped off on a certain batter. And it's my hope that young umps learning the trade may read a conversation like this and pick up on some subtle mechanical hints. TWO EYES ON THE BALL....HEAD STATIONARY!!!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 11, 2011, 07:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Upper Midwest
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by UES View Post
One of the reasons for getting help on check/half swings is because it is impossible to have "one eye on the pitch and the other eye on the swing".
WTF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by UES View Post
not to mention its usually the batter's FRONT foot (the fartherst part of the batter's body away from the umpire) that tends to be outside the box on plays like this.
That's when it's the EASIEST for PU to make the call. Foot, pitch, and bat are all parallaxically close.
__________________
"I don't think I'm very happy. I always fall asleep to the sound of my own screams...and then I always get woken up to the sound of my own screams. Do you think I'm unhappy?"
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 11, 2011, 07:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Upper Midwest
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIZFKU View Post
That's a call I'm never making unless I have been tipped off on a certain batter. And it's my hope that young umps learning the trade may read a conversation like this and pick up on some subtle mechanical hints. TWO EYES ON THE BALL....HEAD STATIONARY!!!
Never generalize. This call can be made in more than a few circumstances.
__________________
"I don't think I'm very happy. I always fall asleep to the sound of my own screams...and then I always get woken up to the sound of my own screams. Do you think I'm unhappy?"
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 12, 2011, 10:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawump View Post
Unless it is Steve Palermo talking on a Fox broadcast...whenever you have to ask this question the answer is "No".
Well, I'm just a fan, so I'm certainly no rules expert. In this case, I thought I knew the rule but wasn't sure. I do remember actually learning a rule from Joe Morgan a few years ago. In a Sunday night ESPN game, a batter who had a 2 strike count attempted to bunt and popped it up foul. My first thought was that it was an immediate dead ball and the batter was out since he bunted a ball foul with 2 strikes. However, on this play, the third baseman caught the ball. Morgan then explained how that was a bad play because it gave the runners the potential to tag up (even though they didn't). He explained that he should have let it drop to make sure that no runners advanced. That was new to me, and I discovered Morgan was correct.

So, some broadcasters do know what they're talking about. I think that most of them know a lot more about game strategy than they do about rules.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 13, 2011, 02:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan10 View Post
I think that most of them know a lot more about game strategy than they do about rules.
And that's what Morgan's situation was: game strategy. Any casual fan of baseball knows bunting foul with two strikes is an out, and any fan of baseball knows a bunted ball caught before hitting the ground is an out. However, a casual fan wouldn't think about the situation given by Morgan.

There's a similar one: With less than two outs and a lazy foul fly to the outfield, should the outfielder catch the ball?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 13, 2011, 07:13am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan10 View Post
Well, I'm just a fan, so I'm certainly no rules expert. In this case, I thought I knew the rule but wasn't sure. I do remember actually learning a rule from Joe Morgan a few years ago. In a Sunday night ESPN game, a batter who had a 2 strike count attempted to bunt and popped it up foul. My first thought was that it was an immediate dead ball and the batter was out since he bunted a ball foul with 2 strikes. However, on this play, the third baseman caught the ball. Morgan then explained how that was a bad play because it gave the runners the potential to tag up (even though they didn't). He explained that he should have let it drop to make sure that no runners advanced. That was new to me, and I discovered Morgan was correct.

So, some broadcasters do know what they're talking about. I think that most of them know a lot more about game strategy than they do about rules.
Joe Morgan is wrong 99.99% of the time on rules. This was the one time in a thousand he was correct.

As was stated before, Steve Palermo is the only "announcer" that knows what he is talking about when it comes to rules. Joe Morgan knows the game and situations but as a former player, Joe is weak on the rules and the concepts. Most of what you hear from announcers are the myths of baseball rules (hands are part of the bat, the runner gets the base he was going to +1, etc.) and because people (fans) think that these bozos know what they are talking about, the festering of myths continues.

If you really want to know rules, keep reading the umpire boards and download the MLB rules (PDF version) from MLB Downloadable Rules. Then when a weird play happens, you can tell your buddies what the real reason was that the umpires made that call.

Enjoy the game!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Out of batter's box CCassistcoach Softball 47 Thu Oct 01, 2009 02:16pm
Batter's Box Help njdevs00cup Baseball 12 Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:59am
Out of batter's box greymule Softball 4 Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:16pm
Batter's Box Question tkistre Softball 11 Mon May 26, 2003 06:45pm
Batter's Box CDcoach Baseball 2 Tue May 06, 2003 04:38pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1