The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 12:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 243
Batter's Box Help

Should the PU inform a batter that he is on the line of the batter's box prior to the pitch?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 01:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

No.

However, if he takes an illegal position, the umpire should instruct him to take a legal position.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 62
On the line is considered a legal starting position. In your situation, the batter is doing nothing wrong. As JM said, if he were in an illegal position, you should have him move. If you notice an illegal starting position, allow the pitcher to pitch, and the batter hits the ball, and then you call him out for being out of the box, you have opened a nasty can of worms for yourself.

As for the back of the batters box, generally you will let them get away with it (in reason) unless the other team says something about it, at which point you will enfore it strictly for both teams.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 02:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
NJ, is that the question you wanted to ask? I'm stumped as to why you would want to tell the batter he is on the line? Did you mean do you "tell the batter they are not in the box"?

If your question is correct, the answer is no.
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 02:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpc2119
As for the back of the batters box, generally you will let them get away with it (in reason) unless the other team says something about it, at which point you will enfore it strictly for both teams.
Spoken like an honor grad! Congratulations.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 02:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarthB
Spoken like an honor grad! Congratulations.
Haha thanks Garth.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 05:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpc2119
If you notice an illegal starting position, allow the pitcher to pitch, and the batter hits the ball, and then you call him out for being out of the box, you have opened a nasty can of worms for yourself.
I hope everyone here knows that there's a huge difference between an improper starting position, and calling a batter out for an illegally batted ball. HUGE, and different in many rule sets.

If a batter is outside box before the pitch, I'll move them in, especially if they're crowding the plate, and blocking my view. I'll enforce the back line if someone is beefing about it. But if a foot is entirely out to the box to start with, or touching the plate for some rule sets, I'd hope we'd all catch that.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 05:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPatrino
NJ, is that the question you wanted to ask? I'm stumped as to why you would want to tell the batter he is on the line? Did you mean do you "tell the batter they are not in the box"?

If your question is correct, the answer is no.
Bob, I know that on (the line) is in and that's the question I wanted to ask. Our association seems to push preventative umpiring (I know others do not). I wanted to see if this fell under preventative umpiring. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 06:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by njdevs00cup
Bob, I know that on (the line) is in and that's the question I wanted to ask. Our association seems to push preventative umpiring (I know others do not). I wanted to see if this fell under preventative umpiring. Thank you.
Yes this would definitely fall under the preventative category.

And Kyle is correct, while having only part of your foot out of the box is an illegal starting position, as long as part of your foot is in the box when you make contact with the ball, you're ok (pro interpretation at least, not positive if it differs in high school).
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 10:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpc2119
Yes this would definitely fall under the preventative category.

And Kyle is correct, while having only part of your foot out of the box is an illegal starting position, as long as part of your foot is in the box when you make contact with the ball, you're ok (pro interpretation at least, not positive if it differs in high school).
It is the same in HS. The only difference would be the foot touching the plate, which is open to interpretation. OBR says that the entire foot has to be out of the box - so you could be touching the plate with your toes/ball of the foot and have your heel in the box (legal). FED says you're out for touching the plate. Open to interp as to completely out or stricly "just touching the plate." In a FED game though, I do call it "by the book" if I see it (but I'd have to have more than the toe just touching the black).

To answer with the OP - no I wouldn't tell them they are on the line. I would tell them if they are out of the box (rather "not in a legal position").
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 10, 2008, 11:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManInBlue
..(but I'd have to have more than the toe just touching the black).
Um, the black isn't part of the plate, so I'd hope you'd never call that.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 11, 2008, 08:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManInBlue
Open to interp as to completely out or stricly "just touching the plate."
It's not really open to interp. In FED and NCAA either being completely out of the box OR touching the plate results in an illegally batted ball.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 11, 2008, 11:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
It's not really open to interp. In FED and NCAA either being completely out of the box OR touching the plate results in an illegally batted ball.
That's the way I read it. I have heard discussion on it (mainly from people that only call OBR).

I agree with your comment completely.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
In or Out of Batter's box rwest Softball 3 Tue May 10, 2005 11:27pm
Out of batter's box greymule Softball 4 Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:16pm
Batter's Box hdsanders Softball 2 Thu Aug 28, 2003 02:49pm
Batter's Box CDcoach Baseball 2 Tue May 06, 2003 04:38pm
Batter's box collinb Softball 3 Sun Mar 25, 2001 10:27pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1